Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
637 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-3562 | 2026-03-13 | N/A | ||
| Philips Hue Bridge hk_hap Ed25519 Signature Verification Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the ed25519_sign_open function. The issue results from improper verification of a cryptographic signature. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-28480. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32614 | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High | ||
| Go ShangMi (Commercial Cryptography) Library (GMSM) is a cryptographic library that covers the Chinese commercial cryptographic public algorithms SM2/SM3/SM4/SM9/ZUC. Prior to 0.41.1, the current SM9 decryption implementation contains an infinity-point ciphertext forgery vulnerability. The root cause is that, during decryption, the elliptic-curve point C1 in the ciphertext is only deserialized and checked to be on the curve, but the implementation does not explicitly reject the point at infinity. In the current implementation, an attacker can construct C1 as the point at infinity, causing the bilinear pairing result to degenerate into the identity element in the GT group. As a result, a critical part of the key derivation input becomes a predictable constant. An attacker who only knows the target user's UID can derive the decryption key material and then forge a ciphertext that passes the integrity check. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.41.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32597 | 1 Jpadilla | 1 Pyjwt | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| PyJWT is a JSON Web Token implementation in Python. Prior to 2.12.0, PyJWT does not validate the crit (Critical) Header Parameter defined in RFC 7515 §4.1.11. When a JWS token contains a crit array listing extensions that PyJWT does not understand, the library accepts the token instead of rejecting it. This violates the MUST requirement in the RFC. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.12.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28432 | 1 Misskey | 1 Misskey | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| Misskey is an open source, federated social media platform. All Misskey servers prior to 2026.3.1 contain a vulnerability that allows bypassing HTTP signature verification. Although this is a vulnerability related to federation, it affects all servers regardless of whether federation is enabled or disabled. This vulnerability is fixed in 2026.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22866 | 2 Ens.domains, Ensdomains | 2 Ethereum Name Service, Ens-contracts | 2026-03-13 | 7.5 High |
| Ethereum Name Service (ENS) is a distributed, open, and extensible naming system based on the Ethereum blockchain. In versions 1.6.2 and prior, the `RSASHA256Algorithm` and `RSASHA1Algorithm` contracts fail to validate PKCS#1 v1.5 padding structure when verifying RSA signatures. The contracts only check if the last 32 (or 20) bytes of the decrypted signature match the expected hash. This enables Bleichenbacher's 2006 signature forgery attack against DNS zones using RSA keys with low public exponents (e=3). Two ENS-supported TLDs (.cc and .name) use e=3 for their Key Signing Keys, allowing any domain under these TLDs to be fraudulently claimed on ENS without DNS ownership. Apatch was merged at commit c76c5ad0dc9de1c966443bd946fafc6351f87587. Possible workarounds include deploying the patched contracts and pointing DNSSECImpl.setAlgorithm to the deployed contract. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41767 | 2 Mbs, Mbs-solutions | 7 Ubr-01 Mk Ii, Ubr-02, Ubr-lon and 4 more | 2026-03-11 | 7.2 High |
| A high-privileged remote attacker can fully compromise the device by abusing an update signature bypass vulnerability in the wwwupdate.cgi method in the web interface of UBR. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3338 | 2 Amazon, Aws | 3 Aws-lc-sys, Aws Libcrypto, Aws-lc | 2026-03-11 | 7.5 High |
| Improper signature validation in PKCS7_verify() in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to bypass signature verification when processing PKCS7 objects with Authenticated Attributes. Customers of AWS services do not need to take action. Applications using AWS-LC should upgrade to AWS-LC version 1.69.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-29000 | 1 Pac4j | 1 Pac4j | 2026-03-11 | 9.1 Critical |
| pac4j-jwt versions prior to 4.5.9, 5.7.9, and 6.3.3 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in JwtAuthenticator when processing encrypted JWTs that allows remote attackers to forge authentication tokens. Attackers who possess the server's RSA public key can create a JWE-wrapped PlainJWT with arbitrary subject and role claims, bypassing signature verification to authenticate as any user including administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15444 | 2 Iamb, Perl | 2 Crypt\, Crypt::sodium::xs | 2026-03-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Crypt::Sodium::XS module versions prior to 0.000042, for Perl, include a vulnerable version of libsodium libsodium <= 1.0.20 or a version of libsodium released before December 30, 2025 contains a vulnerability documented as CVE-2025-69277 https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69277 . The libsodium vulnerability states: In atypical use cases involving certain custom cryptography or untrusted data to crypto_core_ed25519_is_valid_point, mishandles checks for whether an elliptic curve point is valid because it sometimes allows points that aren't in the main cryptographic group. 0.000042 includes a version of libsodium updated to 1.0.20-stable, released January 3, 2026, which includes a fix for the vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3706 | 1 Mkj | 1 Dropbear | 2026-03-10 | 3.7 Low |
| A vulnerability was determined in mkj Dropbear up to 2025.89. Impacted is the function unpackneg of the file src/curve25519.c of the component S Range Check. This manipulation causes improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack can be initiated remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Patch name: fdec3c90a15447bd538641d85e5a3e3ac981011d. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28802 | 1 Authlib | 1 Authlib | 2026-03-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. From version 1.6.5 to before version 1.6.7, previous tests involving passing a malicious JWT containing alg: none and an empty signature was passing the signature verification step without any changes to the application code when a failure was expected.. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.7. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65945 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Node-jws | 2026-03-10 | 7.5 High |
| auth0/node-jws is a JSON Web Signature implementation for Node.js. In versions 3.2.2 and earlier and version 4.0.0, auth0/node-jws has an improper signature verification vulnerability when using the HS256 algorithm under specific conditions. Applications are affected when they use the jws.createVerify() function for HMAC algorithms and use user-provided data from the JSON Web Signature protected header or payload in HMAC secret lookup routines, which can allow attackers to bypass signature verification. This issue has been patched in versions 3.2.3 and 4.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0750 | 2 Drupal, Verifone | 2 Drupal Commerce Paybox, Commerce Paybox | 2026-03-09 | 7.5 High |
| Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in Drupal Drupal Commerce Paybox Commerce Paybox on Drupal 7.X allows Authentication Bypass.This issue affects Drupal Commerce Paybox: from 7-x-1.0 through 7.X-1.5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12150 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Keycloak | 2026-03-06 | 3.1 Low |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak’s WebAuthn registration component. This vulnerability allows an attacker to bypass the configured attestation policy and register untrusted or forged authenticators via submission of an attestation object with fmt: "none", even when the realm is configured to require direct attestation. This can lead to weakened authentication integrity and unauthorized authenticator registration. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52958 | 2 Galaxy Software Services Corporation, Gss | 2 Iota C.ai Conversational Platform, Iota C.ai | 2026-03-06 | 7.2 High |
| A improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in plugin management in iota C.ai Conversational Platform from 1.0.0 through 2.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to load a malicious DLL via upload plugin function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15598 | 2 Dataease, Fit2cloud | 2 Sqlbot, Sqlbot | 2026-03-06 | 3.7 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in Dataease SQLBot up to 1.5.1. This impacts the function validateEmbedded of the file backend/apps/system/middleware/auth.py of the component JWT Token Handler. Performing a manipulation results in improper verification of cryptographic signature. The attack can be initiated remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is said to be difficult. The exploit has been made public and could be used. A comment in the source code warns users about using this feature. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2018-5383 | 4 Apple, Google, Redhat and 1 more | 5 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Android and 2 more | 2026-03-05 | 6.8 Medium |
| Bluetooth firmware or operating system software drivers in macOS versions before 10.13, High Sierra and iOS versions before 11.4, and Android versions before the 2018-06-05 patch may not sufficiently validate elliptic curve parameters used to generate public keys during a Diffie-Hellman key exchange, which may allow a remote attacker to obtain the encryption key used by the device. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27445 | 1 Seppmail | 2 Seppmail, Seppmail Secure Email Gateway | 2026-03-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.1 does not properly verify that a PGP signature was generated by the expected key, allowing signature spoofing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2746 | 1 Seppmail | 2 Seppmail, Seppmail Secure Email Gateway | 2026-03-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| SEPPmail Secure Email Gateway before version 15.0.1 does not properly communicate PGP signature verification results, leaving users unable to detect forged emails. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23518 | 1 Fleetdm | 1 Fleet | 2026-02-27 | 9.8 Critical |
| Fleet is open source device management software. In versions prior to 4.78.3, 4.77.1, 4.76.2, 4.75.2, and 4.53.3, a vulnerability in Fleet's Windows MDM enrollment flow could allow an attacker to submit forged authentication tokens that are not properly validated. Because JWT signatures were not verified, Fleet could accept attacker-controlled identity claims, enabling enrollment of unauthorized devices under arbitrary Azure AD user identities. Versions 4.78.3, 4.77.1, 4.76.2, 4.75.2, and 4.53.3 fix the issue. If an immediate upgrade is not possible, affected Fleet users should temporarily disable Windows MDM. | ||||
ReportizFlow