ReportizFlow
Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
1167 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-22459 | 1 Ivanti | 1 Endpoint Manager | 2025-05-16 | 4.8 Medium |
| Improper certificate validation in Ivanti Endpoint Manager before version 2024 SU1 or before version 2022 SU7 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to intercept limited traffic between clients and servers. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43017 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Verify Access | 2025-05-15 | 8.2 High |
| IBM Security Verify Access 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.6.1 could allow a privileged user to install a configuration file that could allow remote access. IBM X-Force ID: 266155. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41316 | 2 Hashicorp, Redhat | 3 Vault, Openshift, Openshift Data Foundation | 2025-05-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise’s TLS certificate auth method did not initially load the optionally configured CRL issued by the role's CA into memory on startup, resulting in the revocation list not being checked if the CRL has not yet been retrieved. Fixed in 1.12.0, 1.11.4, 1.10.7, and 1.9.10. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20670 | 1 Mediatek | 46 Mt2737, Mt6813, Mt6835 and 43 more | 2025-05-12 | 5.7 Medium |
| In Modem, there is a possible permission bypass due to improper certificate validation. This could lead to remote information disclosure, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01334347; Issue ID: MSV-2772. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000342 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Bc-java, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2025-05-12 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3463 | 2025-05-12 | N/A | ||
| "This issue is limited to motherboards and does not affect laptops, desktop computers, or other endpoints." An insufficient validation vulnerability in ASUS DriverHub may allow untrusted sources to affect system behavior via crafted HTTP requests. Refer to the 'Security Update for ASUS DriverHub' section on the ASUS Security Advisory for more information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-25642 | 1 Sap | 1 Cloud Connector | 2025-05-08 | 7.4 High |
| Due to improper validation of certificate in SAP Cloud Connector - version 2.0, attacker can impersonate the genuine servers to interact with SCC breaking the mutual authentication. Hence, the attacker can intercept the request to view/modify sensitive information. There is no impact on the availability of the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46551 | 2025-05-08 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| JRuby-OpenSSL is an add-on gem for JRuby that emulates the Ruby OpenSSL native library. Starting in JRuby-OpenSSL version 0.12.1 and prior to version 0.15.4 (corresponding to JRuby versions starting in 9.3.4.0 prior to 9.4.12.1 and 10.0.0.0 prior to 10.0.0.1), when verifying SSL certificates, JRuby-OpenSSL does not verify that the hostname presented in the certificate matches the one the user tries to connect to. This means a man-in-the-middle could just present any valid cert for a completely different domain they own, and JRuby would accept the cert. Anybody using JRuby to make requests of external APIs, or scraping the web, that depends on https to connect securely. JRuby-OpenSSL version 0.15.4 contains a fix for the issue. This fix is included in JRuby versions 10.0.0.1 and 9.4.12.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20157 | 2025-05-08 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in certificate validation processing of Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager, formerly Cisco SD-WAN vManage, could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to sensitive information. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of certificates that are used by the Smart Licensing feature. An attacker with a privileged network position could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting traffic that is sent over the Internet. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to gain access to sensitive information, including credentials used by the device to connect to Cisco cloud services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47619 | 2025-05-08 | 7.5 High | ||
| syslog-ng is an enhanced log daemo. Prior to version 4.8.2, `tls_wildcard_match()` matches on certificates such as `foo.*.bar` although that is not allowed. It is also possible to pass partial wildcards such as `foo.a*c.bar` which glib matches but should be avoided / invalidated. This issue could have an impact on TLS connections, such as in man-in-the-middle situations. Version 4.8.2 contains a fix for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28162 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Delphix | 2025-05-07 | 4.2 Medium |
| In Jenkins Delphix Plugin 3.0.1 through 3.1.0 (both inclusive) a global option for administrators to enable or disable SSL/TLS certificate validation for Data Control Tower (DCT) connections fails to take effect until Jenkins is restarted when switching from disabled validation to enabled validation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-28161 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Delphix | 2025-05-07 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Jenkins Delphix Plugin 3.0.1, a global option for administrators to enable or disable SSL/TLS certificate validation for Data Control Tower (DCT) connections is disabled by default. | ||||
| CVE-2025-37730 | 2025-05-07 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Improper certificate validation in Logstash's TCP output could lead to a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack in “client” mode, as hostname verification in TCP output was not being performed when the ssl_verification_mode => full was set. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3218 | 1 Ibm | 1 I | 2025-05-07 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM i 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 is vulnerable to authentication and authorization attacks due to incorrect validation processing in IBM i Netserver. A malicious actor could use the weaknesses, in conjunction with brute force authentication attacks or to bypass authority restrictions, to access the server. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41334 | 2025-05-06 | 8.8 High | ||
| Draytek devices Vigor 165/166 prior to v4.2.6 , Vigor 2620/LTE200 prior to v3.9.8.8, Vigor 2860/2925 prior to v3.9.7, Vigor 2862/2926 prior to v3.9.9.4, Vigor 2133/2762/2832 prior to v3.9.8, Vigor 2135/2765/2766 prior to v4.4.5.1, Vigor 2865/2866/2927 prior to v4.4.5.3, Vigor 2962/3910 prior to v4.3.2.7, Vigor 3912 prior to v4.3.5.2, and Vigor 2925 up to v3.9.6 were discovered to not utilize certificate verification, allowing attackers to upload crafted APPE modules from non-official servers, leading to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1343 | 3 Netapp, Openssl, Redhat | 44 A250, A250 Firmware, A700s and 41 more | 2025-05-05 | 5.3 Medium |
| The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the `OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL "ocsp" application. When verifying an ocsp response with the "-no_cert_checks" option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). | ||||
| CVE-2023-0464 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 4 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 1 more | 2025-05-05 | 7.5 High |
| A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on affected systems. Policy processing is disabled by default but can be enabled by passing the `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()' function. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0057 | 2 Microsoft, Redhat | 19 .net, .net Framework, Powershell and 16 more | 2025-05-03 | 9.1 Critical |
| NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-29050 | 1 Microsoft | 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more | 2025-05-03 | 8.4 High |
| Windows Cryptographic Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-30020 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 11 more | 2025-05-03 | 8.1 High |
| Windows Cryptographic Services Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||