Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Storage
Subscriptions
Total
194 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-15103 | 2 Heketi Project, Redhat | 3 Heketi, Enterprise Linux, Storage | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A security-check flaw was found in the way the Heketi 5 server API handled user requests. An authenticated Heketi user could send specially crafted requests to the Heketi server, resulting in remote command execution as the user running Heketi server and possibly privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15085 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Gluster Storage, Storage | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2017-12150 was not properly shipped in erratum RHSA-2017:2858 for Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15104 | 2 Heketi Project, Redhat | 3 Heketi, Enterprise Linux, Storage | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| An access flaw was found in Heketi 5, where the heketi.json configuration file was world readable. An attacker having local access to the Heketi server could read plain-text passwords from the heketi.json file. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3505 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 5 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Double free vulnerability in d1_both.c in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL 0.9.8 before 0.9.8zb, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0n, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1i allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via crafted DTLS packets that trigger an error condition. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5299 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.3 Medium |
| The shadow_copy2_get_shadow_copy_data function in modules/vfs_shadow_copy2.c in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3 does not verify that the DIRECTORY_LIST access right has been granted, which allows remote attackers to access snapshots by visiting a shadow copy directory. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0224 | 9 Fedoraproject, Filezilla-project, Mariadb and 6 more | 23 Fedora, Filezilla Server, Mariadb and 20 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.4 High |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5223 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Swift, Openstack, Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| OpenStack Object Storage (Swift) before 2.4.0 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via a PUT tempurl and a DLO object manifest that references an object in another container. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2110 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Samba | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 5 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The NTLMSSP authentication implementation in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream to remove application-layer flags or encryption settings, as demonstrated by clearing the NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SEAL or NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN option to disrupt LDAP security. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0737 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Swift, Openstack, Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| OpenStack Object Storage (Swift) before 2.4.0 does not properly close client connections, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (proxy-server resource consumption) via a series of interrupted requests to a Large Object URL. | ||||
| CVE-2014-7960 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Swift, Openstack, Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| OpenStack Object Storage (Swift) before 2.2.0 allows remote authenticated users to bypass the max_meta_count and other metadata constraints via multiple crafted requests which exceed the limit when combined. | ||||
| CVE-2014-8177 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Gluster Storage Management Console, Gluster Storage Server and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Red Hat gluster-swift package, as used in Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly Red Hat Storage Server), allows remote authenticated users to bypass the max_meta_count constraint via multiple crafted requests which exceed the limit when combined. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0105 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Python-keystoneclient, Openstack, Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The auth_token middleware in the OpenStack Python client library for Keystone (aka python-keystoneclient) before 0.7.0 does not properly retrieve user tokens from memcache, which allows remote authenticated users to gain privileges in opportunistic circumstances via a large number of requests, related to an "interaction between eventlet and python-memcached." | ||||
| CVE-2015-5370 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Samba | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not properly implement the DCE-RPC layer, which allows remote attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks, cause a denial of service (application crash or CPU consumption), or possibly execute arbitrary code on a client system via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5296 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.4 Medium |
| Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3 supports connections that are encrypted but unsigned, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct encrypted-to-unencrypted downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream, related to clidfs.c, libsmb_server.c, and smbXcli_base.c. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3223 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 3 Enterprise Linux, Storage, Samba | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The ldb_wildcard_compare function in ldb_match.c in ldb before 1.1.24, as used in the AD LDAP server in Samba 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3, mishandles certain zero values, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via crafted packets. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5242 | 1 Redhat | 2 Gluster Storage, Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| OpenStack Swift-on-File (aka Swiftonfile) does not properly restrict use of the pickle Python module when loading metadata, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a crafted extended attribute (xattrs). | ||||
| CVE-2015-5252 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 5 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.2 High |
| vfs.c in smbd in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.1.22, 4.2.x before 4.2.7, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3, when share names with certain substring relationships exist, allows remote attackers to bypass intended file-access restrictions via a symlink that points outside of a share. | ||||
| CVE-2014-5338 | 2 Check Mk Project, Redhat | 2 Check Mk, Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the multisite component in Check_MK before 1.2.4p4 and 1.2.5 before 1.2.5i4 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors to the (1) render_status_icons function in htmllib.py or (2) ajax_action function in actions.py. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0289 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The PKCS#7 implementation in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not properly handle a lack of outer ContentInfo, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) by leveraging an application that processes arbitrary PKCS#7 data and providing malformed data with ASN.1 encoding, related to crypto/pkcs7/pk7_doit.c and crypto/pkcs7/pk7_lib.c. | ||||
| CVE-2015-0287 | 2 Openssl, Redhat | 3 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Storage | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The ASN1_item_ex_d2i function in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zf, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0r, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1m, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2a does not reinitialize CHOICE and ADB data structures, which might allow attackers to cause a denial of service (invalid write operation and memory corruption) by leveraging an application that relies on ASN.1 structure reuse. | ||||
ReportizFlow