Filtered by vendor 2wire Subscriptions
Total 6 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2009-3962 1 2wire 6 1700hg, 1701hg, 1800hw and 3 more 2024-11-21 N/A
The management interface on the 2wire Gateway 1700HG, 1701HG, 1800HW, 2071, 2700HG, and 2701HG-T with software before 5.29.52 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (reboot) via a %0d%0a sequence in the page parameter to the xslt program on TCP port 50001, a related issue to CVE-2006-4523.
CVE-2008-6605 1 2wire 4 1701hg, 1800hw, 2071hg and 1 more 2024-11-21 N/A
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the xslt script in the web-based management interface on the 2wire 1701HG, 1800HW, 2071HG, and 2700HG with firmware 3.17.5, 3.7.1, 4.25.19, or 5.29.51 allows remote attackers to hijack the intranet connectivity of arbitrary users for requests that cause a denial of service (network outage) via a page parameter with a % (percent) character followed by a non-alphanumeric character.
CVE-2007-4389 1 2wire 3 1701hg Router, 1800hw Router, 2071 Router 2024-11-21 N/A
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /xslt in 2wire 1701HG, 1800HW, and 2071 Gateway routers, with 3.17.5, 3.7.1, and 5.29.51 software, allows remote attackers to create DNS mappings as administrators, and conduct DNS poisoning attacks, via the NAME and ADDR parameters.
CVE-2007-4388 1 2wire 2 1701hg Router, 2071 Router 2024-11-21 N/A
2wire 1701HG and 2071 Gateway routers, with 5.29.51 and possibly 3.17.5 software, have a blank password by default.
CVE-2007-4387 1 2wire 2 1701hg Router, 2071 Router 2024-11-21 N/A
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in /xslt in 2wire 1701HG and 2071 Gateway routers, with 3.17.5 and 5.29.51 software, allows remote attackers to perform certain configuration changes as administrators.
CVE-2004-2749 1 2wire 1 Homeportal 2024-11-21 N/A
Directory traversal vulnerability in wra/public/wralogin in 2Wire Gateway, possibly as used in HomePortal and other product lines, allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the return parameter. NOTE: this issue was reported as XSS, but this might be a terminology error.