Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Total
23252 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-41715 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 24 Go, Acm, Ceph Storage and 21 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Programs which compile regular expressions from untrusted sources may be vulnerable to memory exhaustion or denial of service. The parsed regexp representation is linear in the size of the input, but in some cases the constant factor can be as high as 40,000, making relatively small regexps consume much larger amounts of memory. After fix, each regexp being parsed is limited to a 256 MB memory footprint. Regular expressions whose representation would use more space than that are rejected. Normal use of regular expressions is unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40982 | 5 Debian, Intel, Netapp and 2 more | 1058 Debian Linux, Celeron 5205u, Celeron 5205u Firmware and 1055 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| Information exposure through microarchitectural state after transient execution in certain vector execution units for some Intel(R) Processors may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40964 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Intel and 1 more | 20 Debian Linux, Fedora, Killer and 17 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.9 High |
| Improper access control for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi and Killer(TM) WiFi software may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2022-39399 | 5 Azul, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 2 more | 19 Zulu, Fedora, 7-mode Transition Tool and 16 more | 2025-02-13 | 3.7 Low |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Networking). Supported versions that are affected are Oracle Java SE: 11.0.16.1, 17.0.4.1, 19; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.7, 21.3.3 and 22.2.0. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.7 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). | ||||
| CVE-2022-38076 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Intel and 1 more | 16 Debian Linux, Fedora, Dual Band Wireless-ac 3165 and 13 more | 2025-02-13 | 3.8 Low |
| Improper input validation in some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi and Killer(TM) WiFi software may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3697 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ansible, Ansible Collection | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Ansible in the amazon.aws collection when using the tower_callback parameter from the amazon.aws.ec2_instance module. This flaw allows an attacker to take advantage of this issue as the module is handling the parameter insecurely, leading to the password leaking in the logs. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36351 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Intel and 1 more | 16 Debian Linux, Fedora, Killer and 13 more | 2025-02-13 | 4.3 Medium |
| Improper input validation in some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi and Killer(TM) WiFi software may allow an unauthenticated user to potentially enable denial of service via adjacent access. | ||||
| CVE-2022-34265 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Rhui, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value. Applications that constrain the lookup name and kind choice to a known safe list are unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-34169 | 7 Apache, Azul, Debian and 4 more | 23 Xalan-java, Zulu, Debian Linux and 20 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| The Apache Xalan Java XSLT library is vulnerable to an integer truncation issue when processing malicious XSLT stylesheets. This can be used to corrupt Java class files generated by the internal XSLTC compiler and execute arbitrary Java bytecode. Users are recommended to update to version 2.7.3 or later. Note: Java runtimes (such as OpenJDK) include repackaged copies of Xalan. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2880 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 20 Go, Acm, Ceph Storage and 17 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Requests forwarded by ReverseProxy include the raw query parameters from the inbound request, including unparsable parameters rejected by net/http. This could permit query parameter smuggling when a Go proxy forwards a parameter with an unparsable value. After fix, ReverseProxy sanitizes the query parameters in the forwarded query when the outbound request's Form field is set after the ReverseProxy. Director function returns, indicating that the proxy has parsed the query parameters. Proxies which do not parse query parameters continue to forward the original query parameters unchanged. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2879 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 16 Go, Container Native Virtualization, Devtools and 13 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| Reader.Read does not set a limit on the maximum size of file headers. A maliciously crafted archive could cause Read to allocate unbounded amounts of memory, potentially causing resource exhaustion or panics. After fix, Reader.Read limits the maximum size of header blocks to 1 MiB. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28736 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 4 Grub2, Enterprise Linux, Rhel E4s and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.4 Medium |
| There's a use-after-free vulnerability in grub_cmd_chainloader() function; The chainloader command is used to boot up operating systems that doesn't support multiboot and do not have direct support from GRUB2. When executing chainloader more than once a use-after-free vulnerability is triggered. If an attacker can control the GRUB2's memory allocation pattern sensitive data may be exposed and arbitrary code execution can be achieved. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28735 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 4 Grub2, Enterprise Linux, Rhel E4s and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 6.7 Medium |
| The GRUB2's shim_lock verifier allows non-kernel files to be loaded on shim-powered secure boot systems. Allowing such files to be loaded may lead to unverified code and modules to be loaded in GRUB2 breaking the secure boot trust-chain. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28734 | 3 Gnu, Netapp, Redhat | 5 Grub2, Active Iq Unified Manager, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-02-13 | 8.1 High |
| Out-of-bounds write when handling split HTTP headers; When handling split HTTP headers, GRUB2 HTTP code accidentally moves its internal data buffer point by one position. This can lead to a out-of-bound write further when parsing the HTTP request, writing a NULL byte past the buffer. It's conceivable that an attacker controlled set of packets can lead to corruption of the GRUB2's internal memory metadata. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28733 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 5 Grub2, Enterprise Linux, Rhel E4s and 2 more | 2025-02-13 | 8.1 High |
| Integer underflow in grub_net_recv_ip4_packets; A malicious crafted IP packet can lead to an integer underflow in grub_net_recv_ip4_packets() function on rsm->total_len value. Under certain circumstances the total_len value may end up wrapping around to a small integer number which will be used in memory allocation. If the attack succeeds in such way, subsequent operations can write past the end of the buffer. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28347 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28346 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 7 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 4 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. QuerySet.annotate(), aggregate(), and extra() methods are subject to SQL injection in column aliases via a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the passed **kwargs. | ||||
| CVE-2022-27635 | 4 Debian, Fedoraproject, Intel and 1 more | 20 Debian Linux, Fedora, Killer and 17 more | 2025-02-13 | 8.2 High |
| Improper access control for some Intel(R) PROSet/Wireless WiFi and Killer(TM) WiFi software may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24834 | 3 Fedoraproject, Redhat, Redis | 3 Fedora, Enterprise Linux, Redis | 2025-02-13 | 7 High |
| Redis is an in-memory database that persists on disk. A specially crafted Lua script executing in Redis can trigger a heap overflow in the cjson library, and result with heap corruption and potentially remote code execution. The problem exists in all versions of Redis with Lua scripting support, starting from 2.6, and affects only authenticated and authorized users. The problem is fixed in versions 7.0.12, 6.2.13, and 6.0.20. | ||||
| CVE-2022-23541 | 2 Auth0, Redhat | 2 Jsonwebtoken, Openshift Data Foundation | 2025-02-13 | 5 Medium |
| jsonwebtoken is an implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Versions `<= 8.5.1` of `jsonwebtoken` library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function referring to the `secretOrPublicKey` argument from the readme link will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification, other than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens. If your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function. This issue has been patched, please update to version 9.0.0. | ||||
ReportizFlow