Filtered by vendor Apache
Subscriptions
Total
2996 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-5647 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A bug in the handling of the pipelined requests in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M18, 8.5.0 to 8.5.12, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.42, 7.0.0 to 7.0.76, and 6.0.0 to 6.0.52, when send file was used, results in the pipelined request being lost when send file processing of the previous request completed. This could result in responses appearing to be sent for the wrong request. For example, a user agent that sent requests A, B and C could see the correct response for request A, the response for request C for request B and no response for request C. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5652 | 1 Apache | 1 Impala | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| During a routine security analysis, it was found that one of the ports in Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0 to 2.8.0 sent data in plaintext even when the cluster was configured to use TLS. The port in question was used by the StatestoreSubscriber class which did not use the appropriate secure Thrift transport when TLS was turned on. It was therefore possible for an adversary, with access to the network, to eavesdrop on the packets going to and coming from that port and view the data in plaintext. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7669 | 1 Apache | 1 Hadoop | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Hadoop 2.8.0, 3.0.0-alpha1, and 3.0.0-alpha2, the LinuxContainerExecutor runs docker commands as root with insufficient input validation. When the docker feature is enabled, authenticated users can run commands as root. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5653 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| JAX-RS XML Security streaming clients in Apache CXF before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 do not validate that the service response was signed or encrypted, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5654 | 1 Apache | 1 Ambari | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Ambari 2.4.x (before 2.4.3) and Ambari 2.5.0, an authorized user of the Ambari Hive View may be able to gain unauthorized read access to files on the host where the Ambari server executes. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5655 | 1 Apache | 1 Ambari | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Ambari 2.2.2 through 2.4.2 and Ambari 2.5.0, sensitive data may be stored on disk in temporary files on the Ambari Server host. The temporary files are readable by any user authenticated on the host. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5656 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache CXF's STSClient before 3.1.11 and 3.0.13 uses a flawed way of caching tokens that are associated with delegation tokens, which means that an attacker could craft a token which would return an identifer corresponding to a cached token for another user. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5659 | 1 Apache | 1 Traffic Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Traffic Server before 6.2.1 generates a coredump when there is a mismatch between content length and chunked encoding. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7663 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Both global and Room chat are vulnerable to XSS attack in Apache OpenMeetings 3.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5663 | 1 Apache | 1 Fineract | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Fineract 0.4.0-incubating, 0.5.0-incubating, and 0.6.0-incubating, an authenticated user with client/loan/center/staff/group read permissions is able to inject malicious SQL into SELECT queries. The 'sqlSearch' parameter on a number of endpoints is not sanitized and appended directly to the query. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7662 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf Fediz | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache CXF Fediz ships with an OpenId Connect (OIDC) service which has a Client Registration Service, which is a simple web application that allows clients to be created, deleted, etc. A CSRF (Cross Style Request Forgery) style vulnerability has been found in this web application in Apache CXF Fediz prior to 1.4.0 and 1.3.2, meaning that a malicious web application could create new clients, or reset secrets, etc, after the admin user has logged on to the client registration service and the session is still active. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5664 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The error page mechanism of the Java Servlet Specification requires that, when an error occurs and an error page is configured for the error that occurred, the original request and response are forwarded to the error page. This means that the request is presented to the error page with the original HTTP method. If the error page is a static file, expected behaviour is to serve content of the file as if processing a GET request, regardless of the actual HTTP method. The Default Servlet in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M20, 8.5.0 to 8.5.14, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.43 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.77 did not do this. Depending on the original request this could lead to unexpected and undesirable results for static error pages including, if the DefaultServlet is configured to permit writes, the replacement or removal of the custom error page. Notes for other user provided error pages: (1) Unless explicitly coded otherwise, JSPs ignore the HTTP method. JSPs used as error pages must must ensure that they handle any error dispatch as a GET request, regardless of the actual method. (2) By default, the response generated by a Servlet does depend on the HTTP method. Custom Servlets used as error pages must ensure that they handle any error dispatch as a GET request, regardless of the actual method. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4460 | 1 Apache | 1 Pony Mail | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Pony Mail 0.6c through 0.8b allows remote attackers to bypass authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7679 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 5 Http Server, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache httpd 2.2.x before 2.2.33 and 2.4.x before 2.4.26, mod_mime can read one byte past the end of a buffer when sending a malicious Content-Type response header. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8751 | 1 Apache | 1 Ranger | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Ranger before 0.6.3 is vulnerable to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting in when entering custom policy conditions. Admin users can store some arbitrary javascript code to be executed when normal users login and access policies. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8749 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Camel, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Camel's Jackson and JacksonXML unmarshalling operation are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7681 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. This allows authenticated users to modify the structure of the existing query and leak the structure of other queries being made by the application in the back-end. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6796 | 6 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 3 more | 16 Tomcat, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 13 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| A malicious web application running on Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.0.M9, 8.5.0 to 8.5.4, 8.0.0.RC1 to 8.0.36, 7.0.0 to 7.0.70 and 6.0.0 to 6.0.45 was able to bypass a configured SecurityManager via manipulation of the configuration parameters for the JSP Servlet. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7678 | 1 Apache | 1 Spark | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Spark before 2.2.0, it is possible for an attacker to take advantage of a user's trust in the server to trick them into visiting a link that points to a shared Spark cluster and submits data including MHTML to the Spark master, or history server. This data, which could contain a script, would then be reflected back to the user and could be evaluated and executed by MS Windows-based clients. It is not an attack on Spark itself, but on the user, who may then execute the script inadvertently when viewing elements of the Spark web UIs. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8743 | 4 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 1 more | 13 Http Server, Debian Linux, Clustered Data Ontap and 10 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| Apache HTTP Server, in all releases prior to 2.2.32 and 2.4.25, was liberal in the whitespace accepted from requests and sent in response lines and headers. Accepting these different behaviors represented a security concern when httpd participates in any chain of proxies or interacts with back-end application servers, either through mod_proxy or using conventional CGI mechanisms, and may result in request smuggling, response splitting and cache pollution. | ||||
ReportizFlow