Filtered by vendor Apache
Subscriptions
Total
2404 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2019-10086 | 6 Apache, Debian, Fedoraproject and 3 more | 73 Commons Beanutils, Nifi, Debian Linux and 70 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
In Apache Commons Beanutils 1.9.2, a special BeanIntrospector class was added which allows suppressing the ability for an attacker to access the classloader via the class property available on all Java objects. We, however were not using this by default characteristic of the PropertyUtilsBean. | ||||
CVE-2019-10085 | 1 Apache | 1 Allura | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
In Apache Allura prior to 1.11.0, a vulnerability exists for stored XSS on the user dropdown selector when creating or editing tickets. The XSS executes when a user engages with that dropdown on that page. | ||||
CVE-2019-10084 | 1 Apache | 1 Impala | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
In Apache Impala 2.7.0 to 3.2.0, an authenticated user with access to the IDs of active Impala queries or sessions can interact with those sessions or queries via a specially-constructed request and thereby potentially bypass authorization and audit mechanisms. Session and query IDs are unique and random, but have not been documented or consistently treated as sensitive secrets. Therefore they may be exposed in logs or interfaces. They were also not generated with a cryptographically secure random number generator, so are vulnerable to random number generator attacks that predict future IDs based on past IDs. Impala deployments with Apache Sentry or Apache Ranger authorization enabled may be vulnerable to privilege escalation if an authenticated attacker is able to hijack a session or query from another authenticated user with privileges not assigned to the attacker. Impala deployments with audit logging enabled may be vulnerable to incorrect audit logging as a user could undertake actions that were logged under the name of a different authenticated user. Constructing an attack requires a high degree of technical sophistication and access to the Impala system as an authenticated user. | ||||
CVE-2019-10083 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
When updating a Process Group via the API in NiFi versions 1.3.0 to 1.9.2, the response to the request includes all of its contents (at the top most level, not recursively). The response included details about processors and controller services which the user may not have had read access to. | ||||
CVE-2019-10082 | 3 Apache, Oracle, Redhat | 8 Http Server, Communications Element Manager, Enterprise Manager Ops Center and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.18-2.4.39, using fuzzed network input, the http/2 session handling could be made to read memory after being freed, during connection shutdown. | ||||
CVE-2019-10081 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 4 Http Server, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
HTTP/2 (2.4.20 through 2.4.39) very early pushes, for example configured with "H2PushResource", could lead to an overwrite of memory in the pushing request's pool, leading to crashes. The memory copied is that of the configured push link header values, not data supplied by the client. | ||||
CVE-2019-10080 | 1 Apache | 1 Nifi | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
The XMLFileLookupService in NiFi versions 1.3.0 to 1.9.2 allowed trusted users to inadvertently configure a potentially malicious XML file. The XML file has the ability to make external calls to services (via XXE) and reveal information such as the versions of Java, Jersey, and Apache that the NiFI instance uses. | ||||
CVE-2019-10079 | 1 Apache | 1 Traffic Server | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Apache Traffic Server is vulnerable to HTTP/2 setting flood attacks. Earlier versions of Apache Traffic Server didn't limit the number of setting frames sent from the client using the HTTP/2 protocol. Users should upgrade to Apache Traffic Server 7.1.7, 8.0.4, or later versions. | ||||
CVE-2019-10078 | 1 Apache | 1 Jspwiki | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
A carefully crafted plugin link invocation could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki 2.9.0 to 2.11.0.M3, which could lead to session hijacking. Initial reporting indicated ReferredPagesPlugin, but further analysis showed that multiple plugins were vulnerable. | ||||
CVE-2019-10077 | 1 Apache | 1 Jspwiki | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
A carefully crafted InterWiki link could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki 2.9.0 to 2.11.0.M3, which could lead to session hijacking. | ||||
CVE-2019-10076 | 1 Apache | 1 Jspwiki | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
A carefully crafted malicious attachment could trigger an XSS vulnerability on Apache JSPWiki 2.9.0 to 2.11.0.M3, which could lead to session hijacking. | ||||
CVE-2019-10074 | 1 Apache | 1 Ofbiz | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
An RCE is possible by entering Freemarker markup in an Apache OFBiz Form Widget textarea field when encoding has been disabled on such a field. This was the case for the Customer Request "story" input in the Order Manager application. Encoding should not be disabled without good reason and never within a field that accepts user input. Mitigation: Upgrade to 16.11.06 or manually apply the following commit on branch 16.11: r1858533 | ||||
CVE-2019-10073 | 1 Apache | 1 Ofbiz | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
The "Blog", "Forum", "Contact Us" screens of the template "ecommerce" application bundled in Apache OFBiz are weak to Stored XSS attacks. Mitigation: Upgrade to 16.11.06 or manually apply the following commits on branch 16.11: 1858438, 1858543, 1860595 and 1860616 | ||||
CVE-2019-10072 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Tomcat, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The fix for CVE-2019-0199 was incomplete and did not address HTTP/2 connection window exhaustion on write in Apache Tomcat versions 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.19 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.40 . By not sending WINDOW_UPDATE messages for the connection window (stream 0) clients were able to cause server-side threads to block eventually leading to thread exhaustion and a DoS. | ||||
CVE-2019-10071 | 1 Apache | 1 Tapestry | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
The code which checks HMAC in form submissions used String.equals() for comparisons, which results in a timing side channel for the comparison of the HMAC signatures. This could lead to remote code execution if an attacker is able to determine the correct signature for their payload. The comparison should be done with a constant time algorithm instead. | ||||
CVE-2019-10070 | 1 Apache | 1 Atlas | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
Apache Atlas versions 0.8.3 and 1.1.0 were found vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in the search functionality | ||||
CVE-2019-0235 | 1 Apache | 1 Ofbiz | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
Apache OFBiz 17.12.01 is vulnerable to some CSRF attacks. | ||||
CVE-2019-0234 | 1 Apache | 1 Roller | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
A Reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Apache Roller. Roller's Math Comment Authenticator did not property sanitize user input and could be exploited to perform Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS). The mitigation for this vulnerability is to upgrade to the latest version of Roller, which is now Roller 5.2.3. | ||||
CVE-2019-0233 | 2 Apache, Oracle | 5 Struts, Communications Policy Management, Financial Services Data Integration Hub and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
An access permission override in Apache Struts 2.0.0 to 2.5.20 may cause a Denial of Service when performing a file upload. | ||||
CVE-2019-0232 | 3 Apache, Microsoft, Redhat | 3 Tomcat, Windows, Jboss Enterprise Web Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
When running on Windows with enableCmdLineArguments enabled, the CGI Servlet in Apache Tomcat 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.17, 8.5.0 to 8.5.39 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.93 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution due to a bug in the way the JRE passes command line arguments to Windows. The CGI Servlet is disabled by default. The CGI option enableCmdLineArguments is disable by default in Tomcat 9.0.x (and will be disabled by default in all versions in response to this vulnerability). For a detailed explanation of the JRE behaviour, see Markus Wulftange's blog (https://codewhitesec.blogspot.com/2016/02/java-and-command-line-injections-in-windows.html) and this archived MSDN blog (https://web.archive.org/web/20161228144344/https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/twistylittlepassagesallalike/2011/04/23/everyone-quotes-command-line-arguments-the-wrong-way/). |