Filtered by vendor Djangoproject
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Django
Subscriptions
Total
136 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-0305 | 3 Canonical, Djangoproject, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Django, Openstack | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The administrative interface for Django 1.3.x before 1.3.6, 1.4.x before 1.4.4, and 1.5 before release candidate 2 does not check permissions for the history view, which allows remote authenticated administrators to obtain sensitive object history information. | ||||
| CVE-2013-1443 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The authentication framework (django.contrib.auth) in Django 1.4.x before 1.4.8, 1.5.x before 1.5.4, and 1.6.x before 1.6 beta 4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a long password which is then hashed. | ||||
| CVE-2010-4534 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The administrative interface in django.contrib.admin in Django before 1.1.3, 1.2.x before 1.2.4, and 1.3.x before 1.3 beta 1 does not properly restrict use of the query string to perform certain object filtering, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive information via a series of requests containing regular expressions, as demonstrated by a created_by__password__regex parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2011-0696 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 does not properly validate HTTP requests that contain an X-Requested-With header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via forged AJAX requests that leverage a "combination of browser plugins and redirects," a related issue to CVE-2011-0447. | ||||
| CVE-2011-0697 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Django 1.1.x before 1.1.4 and 1.2.x before 1.2.5 might allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a filename associated with a file upload. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4136 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| django.contrib.sessions in Django before 1.2.7 and 1.3.x before 1.3.1, when session data is stored in the cache, uses the root namespace for both session identifiers and application-data keys, which allows remote attackers to modify a session by triggering use of a key that is equal to that session's identifier. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4140 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The CSRF protection mechanism in Django through 1.2.7 and 1.3.x through 1.3.1 does not properly handle web-server configurations supporting arbitrary HTTP Host headers, which allows remote attackers to trigger unauthenticated forged requests via vectors involving a DNS CNAME record and a web page containing JavaScript code. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4249 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the AdminURLFieldWidget widget in contrib/admin/widgets.py in Django 1.5.x before 1.5.2 and 1.6.x before 1.6 beta 2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a URLField. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6044 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 2 Django, Openstack | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The is_safe_url function in utils/http.py in Django 1.4.x before 1.4.6, 1.5.x before 1.5.2, and 1.6 before beta 2 treats a URL's scheme as safe even if it is not HTTP or HTTPS, which might introduce cross-site scripting (XSS) or other vulnerabilities into Django applications that use this function, as demonstrated by "the login view in django.contrib.auth.views" and the javascript: scheme. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4137 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The verify_exists functionality in the URLField implementation in Django before 1.2.7 and 1.3.x before 1.3.1 relies on Python libraries that attempt access to an arbitrary URL with no timeout, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption) via a URL associated with (1) a slow response, (2) a completed TCP connection with no application data sent, or (3) a large amount of application data, a related issue to CVE-2011-1521. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4138 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The verify_exists functionality in the URLField implementation in Django before 1.2.7 and 1.3.x before 1.3.1 originally tests a URL's validity through a HEAD request, but then uses a GET request for the new target URL in the case of a redirect, which might allow remote attackers to trigger arbitrary GET requests with an unintended source IP address via a crafted Location header. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4139 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Django before 1.2.7 and 1.3.x before 1.3.1 uses a request's HTTP Host header to construct a full URL in certain circumstances, which allows remote attackers to conduct cache poisoning attacks via a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2009-3695 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in the forms library in Django 1.0 before 1.0.4 and 1.1 before 1.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted (1) EmailField (email address) or (2) URLField (URL) that triggers a large amount of backtracking in a regular expression. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23969 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Django, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-03-27 | 7.5 High |
| In Django 3.2 before 3.2.17, 4.0 before 4.0.9, and 4.1 before 4.1.6, the parsed values of Accept-Language headers are cached in order to avoid repetitive parsing. This leads to a potential denial-of-service vector via excessive memory usage if the raw value of Accept-Language headers is very large. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24580 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-03-18 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in the Multipart Request Parser in Django 3.2 before 3.2.18, 4.0 before 4.0.10, and 4.1 before 4.1.7. Passing certain inputs (e.g., an excessive number of parts) to multipart forms could result in too many open files or memory exhaustion, and provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45231 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2025-03-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django v5.1.1, v5.0.9, and v4.2.16. The django.contrib.auth.forms.PasswordResetForm class, when used in a view implementing password reset flows, allows remote attackers to enumerate user e-mail addresses by sending password reset requests and observing the outcome (only when e-mail sending is consistently failing). | ||||
| CVE-2024-45230 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 2 Django, Ansible Automation Platform | 2025-03-17 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.1, 5.0 before 5.0.9, and 4.2 before 4.2.16. The urlize() and urlizetrunc() template filters are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via very large inputs with a specific sequence of characters. | ||||
| CVE-2022-36359 | 2 Debian, Djangoproject | 2 Debian Linux, Django | 2025-02-13 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in the HTTP FileResponse class in Django 3.2 before 3.2.15 and 4.0 before 4.0.7. An application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack that sets the Content-Disposition header of a FileResponse when the filename is derived from user-supplied input. | ||||
| CVE-2022-34265 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Rhui, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered in Django 3.2 before 3.2.14 and 4.0 before 4.0.6. The Trunc() and Extract() database functions are subject to SQL injection if untrusted data is used as a kind/lookup_name value. Applications that constrain the lookup name and kind choice to a known safe list are unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28347 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-02-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| A SQL injection issue was discovered in QuerySet.explain() in Django 2.2 before 2.2.28, 3.2 before 3.2.13, and 4.0 before 4.0.4. This occurs by passing a crafted dictionary (with dictionary expansion) as the **options argument, and placing the injection payload in an option name. | ||||
ReportizFlow