Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
12661 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-25914 | 2 Jib Project, Redhat | 2 Jib, Migration Toolkit Runtimes | 2024-11-21 | 5.6 Medium |
| The package com.google.cloud.tools:jib-core before 0.22.0 are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via the isDockerInstalled function, due to attempting to execute input. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25839 | 1 Url-js Project | 1 Url-js | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| The package url-js before 2.1.0 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation due to improper parsing, which makes it is possible for the hostname to be spoofed. http://\\\\\\\\localhost and http://localhost are the same URL. However, the hostname is not parsed as localhost, and the backslash is reflected as it is. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25818 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper boundary check in UWB stack prior to SMR Mar-2022 Release 1 allows arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25757 | 1 Apache | 1 Apisix | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Apache APISIX before 2.13.0, when decoding JSON with duplicate keys, lua-cjson will choose the last occurred value as the result. By passing a JSON with a duplicate key, the attacker can bypass the body_schema validation in the request-validation plugin. For example, `{"string_payload":"bad","string_payload":"good"}` can be used to hide the "bad" input. Systems satisfy three conditions below are affected by this attack: 1. use body_schema validation in the request-validation plugin 2. upstream application uses a special JSON library that chooses the first occurred value, like jsoniter or gojay 3. upstream application does not validate the input anymore. The fix in APISIX is to re-encode the validated JSON input back into the request body at the side of APISIX. Improper Input Validation vulnerability in __COMPONENT__ of Apache APISIX allows an attacker to __IMPACT__. This issue affects Apache APISIX Apache APISIX version 2.12.1 and prior versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25751 | 1 Siemens | 48 Scalance X302-7eec, Scalance X302-7eec Firmware, Scalance X304-2fe and 45 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X302-7 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X304-2FE, SCALANCE X306-1LD FE, SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 230V, coated), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V), SCALANCE X307-2 EEC (2x 24V, coated), SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X307-3LD, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LD, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2LH+, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M PoE, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X308-2M TS, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X310FE, SCALANCE X320-1 FE, SCALANCE X320-1-2LD FE, SCALANCE X408-2, SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-12M TS (24V), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 100-240VAC/60-250VDC, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M EEC (2x 24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (230V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on front), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE (24V, ports on rear), SCALANCE XR324-4M PoE TS (24V, ports on front), SIPLUS NET SCALANCE X308-2. Affected devices do not properly validate the HTTP headers of incoming requests. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash affected devices. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25729 | 1 Qualcomm | 60 Ar8031, Ar8031 Firmware, Csra6620 and 57 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Memory corruption in modem due to improper length check while copying into memory | ||||
| CVE-2022-25595 | 1 Asus | 2 Rt-ac86u, Rt-ac86u Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| ASUS RT-AC86U has improper user request handling, which allows an unauthenticated LAN attacker to cause a denial of service by sending particular request a server-to-client reply attempt. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25271 | 2 Drupal, Fedoraproject | 2 Drupal, Fedora | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Drupal core's form API has a vulnerability where certain contributed or custom modules' forms may be vulnerable to improper input validation. This could allow an attacker to inject disallowed values or overwrite data. Affected forms are uncommon, but in certain cases an attacker could alter critical or sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25167 | 1 Apache | 1 Flume | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Apache Flume versions 1.4.0 through 1.9.0 are vulnerable to a remote code execution (RCE) attack when a configuration uses a JMS Source with a JNDI LDAP data source URI when an attacker has control of the target LDAP server. This issue is fixed by limiting JNDI to allow only the use of the java protocol or no protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25163 | 2 Mistubishi, Mitsubishi | 6 Melsec Qj71e71-100, Melsec Iq-r Rd81mes96n, Melsec Iq-r Rd81mes96n Firmware and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-Q Series QJ71E71-100 first 5 digits of serial number "24061" or prior, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC-L series LJ71E71-100 first 5 digits of serial number "24061" or prior and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-R Series RD81MES96N firmware version "08" or prior allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition or execute malicious code on the target products by sending specially crafted packets. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25162 | 2 Mitsubhishielectric, Mitsubishielectric | 194 Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds Firmware, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/dss and 191 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DSS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MR/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/z(x=24,40,60, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) versions prior to 1.030, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/ES-A(x=24,40,60, y=T,R) versions prior to 1.031 and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5S-xMy/z(x=30,40,60,80, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) version 1.000 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a temporary DoS condition for the product's communication by sending specially crafted packets. | ||||
| CVE-2022-25161 | 2 Mitsubhishielectric, Mitsubishielectric | 194 Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/ds Firmware, Melsec Iq-fx5u-32mr\/dss and 191 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.6 High |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5U-xMy/z(x=32,64,80, y=T,R, z=ES,DS,ESS,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 17X**** or later and versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-xMy/z(x=32,64,96, y=T,R, z=D,DSS) with serial number 179**** and prior and versions prior to 1.073, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MT/DSS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UC-32MR/DS-TS versions prior to 1.270, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/z(x=24,40,60, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) versions prior to 1.030, Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5UJ-xMy/ES-A(x=24,40,60, y=T,R) versions prior to 1.031 and Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F series FX5S-xMy/z(x=30,40,60,80, y=T,R, z=ES,ESS) version 1.000 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a DoS condition for the product's program execution or communication by sending specially crafted packets. System reset of the product is required for recovery. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24952 | 1 Eternal Terminal Project | 1 Eternal Terminal | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Several denial of service vulnerabilities exist in Eternal Terminal prior to version 6.2.0, including a DoS triggered remotely by an invalid sequence number and a local bug triggered by invalid input sent directly to the IPC socket. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24926 | 1 Samsung | 1 Smarttagplugin | 2024-11-21 | 5.7 Medium |
| Improper input validation vulnerability in SmartTagPlugin prior to version 1.2.15-6 allows privileged attackers to trigger a XSS on a victim's devices. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24925 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2024-11-21 | 4.4 Medium |
| Improper input validation vulnerability in SettingsProvider prior to Android S(12) allows privileged attackers to trigger a permanent denial of service attack on a victim's devices. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24423 | 1 Dell | 2 Integrated Dell Remote Access Controller 8, Integrated Dell Remote Access Controller 8 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Dell iDRAC8 versions prior to 2.83.83.83 contain a denial of service vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to cause resource exhaustion in the webserver, resulting in a denial of service condition. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24418 | 1 Dell | 56 Dell G5 5505, Dell G5 5505 Firmware, Inspiron 22-3275 and 53 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Dell BIOS contains an improper input validation vulnerability. A local authenticated malicious user may potentially exploit this vulnerability by using an SMI to gain arbitrary code execution during SMM. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24417 | 1 Dell | 56 Dell G5 5505, Dell G5 5505 Firmware, Inspiron 22-3275 and 53 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Dell BIOS contains an improper input validation vulnerability. A local authenticated malicious user may potentially exploit this vulnerability by using an SMI to gain arbitrary code execution during SMM. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24379 | 1 Intel | 4 Server Board M70klp2sb, Server Board M70klp2sb Firmware, Server System M70klp4s2uhh and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation in some Intel(R) Server System M70KLP Family BIOS firmware before version 01.04.0029 may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2022-24299 | 1 Netgate | 2 Pfsense, Pfsense Plus | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Improper input validation vulnerability in pfSense CE and pfSense Plus (pfSense CE software versions prior to 2.6.0 and pfSense Plus software versions prior to 22.01) allows a remote attacker with the privilege to change OpenVPN client or server settings to execute an arbitrary command. | ||||
ReportizFlow