Filtered by vendor Apache
Subscriptions
Total
2768 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-9800 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Subversion, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A maliciously constructed svn+ssh:// URL would cause Subversion clients before 1.8.19, 1.9.x before 1.9.7, and 1.10.0.x through 1.10.0-alpha3 to run an arbitrary shell command. Such a URL could be generated by a malicious server, by a malicious user committing to a honest server (to attack another user of that server's repositories), or by a proxy server. The vulnerability affects all clients, including those that use file://, http://, and plain (untunneled) svn://. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5640 | 1 Apache | 1 Impala | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| It was noticed that a malicious process impersonating an Impala daemon in Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0 to 2.8.0 could cause Impala daemons to skip authentication checks when Kerberos is enabled (but TLS is not). If the malicious server responds with 'COMPLETE' before the SASL handshake has completed, the client will consider the handshake as completed even though no exchange of credentials has happened. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7661 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf Fediz | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache CXF Fediz ships with a number of container-specific plugins to enable WS-Federation for applications. A CSRF (Cross Style Request Forgery) style vulnerability has been found in the Spring 2, Spring 3, Jetty 8 and Jetty 9 plugins in Apache CXF Fediz prior to 1.4.0, 1.3.2 and 1.2.4. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0779 | 1 Apache | 1 Tomee | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The EjbObjectInputStream class in Apache TomEE before 1.7.4 and 7.x before 7.0.0-M3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized object. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7682 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 3.2.0 is vulnerable to parameter manipulation attacks, as a result attacker has access to restricted areas. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7680 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 has an overly permissive crossdomain.xml file. This allows for flash content to be loaded from untrusted domains. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6798 | 1 Apache | 1 Sling | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In the XSS Protection API module before 1.0.12 in Apache Sling, the method XSS.getValidXML() uses an insecure SAX parser to validate the input string, which allows for XXE attacks in all scripts which use this method to validate user input, potentially allowing an attacker to read sensitive data on the filesystem, perform same-site-request-forgery (SSRF), port-scanning behind the firewall or DoS the application. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7673 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 uses not very strong cryptographic storage, captcha is not used in registration and forget password dialogs and auth forms missing brute force protection. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7683 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 displays Tomcat version and detailed error stack trace, which is not secure. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5396 | 1 Apache | 1 Traffic Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Traffic Server 6.0.0 to 6.2.0 are affected by an HPACK Bomb Attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9794 | 1 Apache | 1 Geode | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When a cluster is operating in secure mode, a user with read privileges for specific data regions can use the gfsh command line utility to execute queries. In Apache Geode before 1.2.1, the query results may contain data from another user's concurrently executing gfsh query, potentially revealing data that the user is not authorized to view. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7666 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks, XSS attacks, click-jacking, and MIME based attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7664 | 1 Apache | 1 Openmeetings | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Uploaded XML documents were not correctly validated in Apache OpenMeetings 3.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5662 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 5 Batik, Jboss Amq, Jboss Bpms and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Batik before 1.9, files lying on the filesystem of the server which uses batik can be revealed to arbitrary users who send maliciously formed SVG files. The file types that can be shown depend on the user context in which the exploitable application is running. If the user is root a full compromise of the server - including confidential or sensitive files - would be possible. XXE can also be used to attack the availability of the server via denial of service as the references within a xml document can trivially trigger an amplification attack. | ||||
| CVE-2012-4449 | 1 Apache | 1 Hadoop | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Hadoop before 0.23.4, 1.x before 1.0.4, and 2.x before 2.0.2 generate token passwords using a 20-bit secret when Kerberos security features are enabled, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to crack secret keys via a brute-force attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5642 | 1 Apache | 1 Ambari | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| During installation of Ambari 2.4.0 through 2.4.2, Ambari Server artifacts are not created with proper ACLs. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5654 | 1 Apache | 1 Ambari | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Ambari 2.4.x (before 2.4.3) and Ambari 2.5.0, an authorized user of the Ambari Hive View may be able to gain unauthorized read access to files on the host where the Ambari server executes. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0880 | 1 Apache | 1 Xerces-c\+\+ | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Xerces-C++ allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted message sent to an XML service that causes hash table collisions. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3155 | 1 Apache | 1 Atlas | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating were found vulnerable to cross frame scripting. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12625 | 1 Apache | 1 Hive | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Hive 2.1.x before 2.1.2, 2.2.x before 2.2.1, and 2.3.x before 2.3.1 expose an interface through which masking policies can be defined on tables or views, e.g., using Apache Ranger. When a view is created over a given table, the policy enforcement does not happen correctly on the table for masked columns. | ||||
ReportizFlow