Filtered by vendor Isc
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Bind
Subscriptions
Total
185 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2002-2213 | 2 Infoblox, Isc | 2 Dns One, Bind | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The DNS resolver in unspecified versions of Infoblox DNS One, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. | ||||
| CVE-2006-2073 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in ISC BIND allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted DNS message with a "broken" TSIG, as demonstrated by the OUSPG PROTOS DNS test suite. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0034 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| An "incorrect assumption" in the authvalidated validator function in BIND 9.3.0, when DNSSEC is enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (named server exit) via crafted DNS packets that cause an internal consistency test (self-check) to fail. | ||||
| CVE-2001-0010 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 2 Bind, Linux | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in transaction signature (TSIG) handling code in BIND 8 allows remote attackers to gain root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0914 | 9 Compaq, Freebsd, Hp and 6 more | 10 Tru64, Freebsd, Hp-ux and 7 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| ISC BIND 8.3.x before 8.3.7, and 8.4.x before 8.4.3, allows remote attackers to poison the cache via a malicious name server that returns negative responses with a large TTL (time-to-live) value. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0011 | 8 Data General, Ibm, Isc and 5 more | 11 Dg Ux, Aix, Bind and 8 more | 2026-04-16 | 5.4 Medium |
| Denial of Service vulnerabilities in BIND 4.9 and BIND 8 Releases via CNAME record and zone transfer. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0184 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| When compiled with the -DALLOW_UPDATES option, bind allows dynamic updates to the DNS server, allowing for malicious modification of DNS records. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0010 | 8 Data General, Ibm, Isc and 5 more | 11 Dg Ux, Aix, Bind and 8 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Denial of Service vulnerability in BIND 8 Releases via maliciously formatted DNS messages. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0335 | 2 Gnu, Isc | 2 Glibc, Bind | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The resolver in glibc 2.1.3 uses predictable IDs, which allows a local attacker to spoof DNS query results. | ||||
| CVE-2002-2212 | 2 Fujitsu, Isc | 2 Uxp V, Bind | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The DNS resolver in unspecified versions of Fujitsu UXP/V, when resolving recursive DNS queries for arbitrary hosts, allows remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning via a birthday attack that uses a large number of open queries for the same resource record (RR) combined with spoofed responses, which increases the possibility of successfully spoofing a response in a way that is more efficient than brute force methods. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13878 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Malformed BRID/HHIT records can cause `named` to terminate unexpectedly. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.40 through 9.18.43, 9.20.13 through 9.20.17, 9.21.12 through 9.21.16, 9.18.40-S1 through 9.18.43-S1, and 9.20.13-S1 through 9.20.17-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1737 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 8 Bind, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Resolver caches and authoritative zone databases that hold significant numbers of RRs for the same hostname (of any RTYPE) can suffer from degraded performance as content is being added or updated, and also when handling client queries for this name. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.11.37, 9.16.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, 9.11.4-S1 through 9.11.37-S1, 9.16.8-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-0760 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1975 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 8 Bind, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 5 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| If a server hosts a zone containing a "KEY" Resource Record, or a resolver DNSSEC-validates a "KEY" Resource Record from a DNSSEC-signed domain in cache, a client can exhaust resolver CPU resources by sending a stream of SIG(0) signed requests. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.0.0 through 9.11.37, 9.16.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, 9.9.3-S1 through 9.11.37-S1, 9.16.8-S1 through 9.16.49-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40777 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| If a `named` caching resolver is configured with `serve-stale-enable` `yes`, and with `stale-answer-client-timeout` set to `0` (the only allowable value other than `disabled`), and if the resolver, in the process of resolving a query, encounters a CNAME chain involving a specific combination of cached or authoritative records, the daemon will abort with an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.20.0 through 9.20.10, 9.21.0 through 9.21.9, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.10-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40776 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| A `named` caching resolver that is configured to send ECS (EDNS Client Subnet) options may be vulnerable to a cache-poisoning attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.3-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.37-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.10-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4076 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 7 Bind, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 4 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Client queries that trigger serving stale data and that also require lookups in local authoritative zone data may result in an assertion failure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.13 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, 9.11.33-S1 through 9.11.37-S1, 9.16.13-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1519 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-04-13 | 7.5 High |
| If a BIND resolver is performing DNSSEC validation and encounters a maliciously crafted zone, the resolver may consume excessive CPU. Authoritative-only servers are generally unaffected, although there are circumstances where authoritative servers may make recursive queries (see: https://kb.isc.org/docs/why-does-my-authoritative-server-make-recursive-queries). This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.46, 9.20.0 through 9.20.20, 9.21.0 through 9.21.19, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.46-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.20-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3119 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-03-26 | 6.5 Medium |
| Under certain conditions, `named` may crash when processing a correctly signed query containing a TKEY record. The affected code can only be reached if an incoming request has a valid transaction signature (TSIG) from a key declared in the `named` configuration. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.20.0 through 9.20.20, 9.21.0 through 9.21.19, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.20-S1. BIND 9 versions 9.18.0 through 9.18.46 and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.46-S1 are NOT affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3591 | 1 Isc | 1 Bind | 2026-03-26 | 5.4 Medium |
| A use-after-return vulnerability exists in the `named` server when handling DNS queries signed with SIG(0). Using a specially-crafted DNS request, an attacker may be able to cause an ACL to improperly (mis)match an IP address. In a default-allow ACL (denying only specific IP addresses), this may lead to unauthorized access. Default-deny ACLs should fail-secure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.20.0 through 9.20.20, 9.21.0 through 9.21.19, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.20-S1. BIND 9 versions 9.18.0 through 9.18.46 and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.46-S1 are NOT affected. | ||||
ReportizFlow