ReportizFlow
Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Ansible Automation Platform
Subscriptions
Total
158 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-40267 | 2 Gitpython Project, Redhat | 4 Gitpython, Ansible Automation Platform, Satellite and 1 more | 2025-11-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| GitPython before 3.1.32 does not block insecure non-multi options in clone and clone_from. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2022-24439. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52304 | 3 Aiohttp, Python, Redhat | 5 Aiohttp, Aiohttp, Ansible Automation Platform and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.10.11, the Python parser parses newlines in chunk extensions incorrectly which can lead to request smuggling vulnerabilities under certain conditions. If a pure Python version of aiohttp is installed (i.e. without the usual C extensions) or `AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS` is enabled, then an attacker may be able to execute a request smuggling attack to bypass certain firewalls or proxy protections. Version 3.10.11 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30251 | 3 Aio-libs Project, Aiohttp, Redhat | 4 Aiohttp, Aiohttp, Ansible Automation Platform and 1 more | 2025-11-04 | 7.5 High |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. In affected versions an attacker can send a specially crafted POST (multipart/form-data) request. When the aiohttp server processes it, the server will enter an infinite loop and be unable to process any further requests. An attacker can stop the application from serving requests after sending a single request. This issue has been addressed in version 3.9.4. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may manually apply a patch to their systems. Please see the linked GHSA for instructions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27306 | 3 Aiohttp, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Aiohttp, Fedora, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 6.1 Medium |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. A XSS vulnerability exists on index pages for static file handling. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.9.4. We have always recommended using a reverse proxy server (e.g. nginx) for serving static files. Users following the recommendation are unaffected. Other users can disable `show_index` if unable to upgrade. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23829 | 3 Aiohttp, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Aiohttp, Fedora, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Security-sensitive parts of the Python HTTP parser retained minor differences in allowable character sets, that must trigger error handling to robustly match frame boundaries of proxies in order to protect against injection of additional requests. Additionally, validation could trigger exceptions that were not handled consistently with processing of other malformed input. Being more lenient than internet standards require could, depending on deployment environment, assist in request smuggling. The unhandled exception could cause excessive resource consumption on the application server and/or its logging facilities. This vulnerability exists due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-47627. Version 3.9.2 fixes this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23334 | 3 Aiohttp, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 6 Aiohttp, Fedora, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-11-04 | 5.9 Medium |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. When using aiohttp as a web server and configuring static routes, it is necessary to specify the root path for static files. Additionally, the option 'follow_symlinks' can be used to determine whether to follow symbolic links outside the static root directory. When 'follow_symlinks' is set to True, there is no validation to check if reading a file is within the root directory. This can lead to directory traversal vulnerabilities, resulting in unauthorized access to arbitrary files on the system, even when symlinks are not present. Disabling follow_symlinks and using a reverse proxy are encouraged mitigations. Version 3.9.2 fixes this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47627 | 2 Aiohttp, Redhat | 5 Aiohttp, Ansible Automation Platform, Rhui and 2 more | 2025-11-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| aiohttp is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. The HTTP parser in AIOHTTP has numerous problems with header parsing, which could lead to request smuggling. This parser is only used when AIOHTTP_NO_EXTENSIONS is enabled (or not using a prebuilt wheel). These bugs have been addressed in commit `d5c12ba89` which has been included in release version 3.8.6. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for these issues. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27516 | 3 Debian, Palletsprojects, Redhat | 11 Debian Linux, Jinja, Ansible Automation Platform and 8 more | 2025-11-03 | 8.8 High |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.6, an oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment interacts with the |attr filter allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to use the |attr filter to get a reference to a string's plain format method, bypassing the sandbox. After the fix, the |attr filter no longer bypasses the environment's attribute lookup. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.6. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56326 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 15 Jinja, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 12 more | 2025-11-03 | 7.8 High |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. Prior to 3.1.5, An oversight in how the Jinja sandboxed environment detects calls to str.format allows an attacker that controls the content of a template to execute arbitrary Python code. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control the content of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates. Jinja's sandbox does catch calls to str.format and ensures they don't escape the sandbox. However, it's possible to store a reference to a malicious string's format method, then pass that to a filter that calls it. No such filters are built-in to Jinja, but could be present through custom filters in an application. After the fix, such indirect calls are also handled by the sandbox. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.5. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5752 | 2 Pypa, Redhat | 2 Pip, Ansible Automation Platform | 2025-11-03 | 5.5 Medium |
| When installing a package from a Mercurial VCS URL (ie "pip install hg+...") with pip prior to v23.3, the specified Mercurial revision could be used to inject arbitrary configuration options to the "hg clone" call (ie "--config"). Controlling the Mercurial configuration can modify how and which repository is installed. This vulnerability does not affect users who aren't installing from Mercurial. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3576 | 1 Redhat | 9 Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2025-10-30 | 5.9 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the MIT Kerberos implementation allows GSSAPI-protected messages using RC4-HMAC-MD5 to be spoofed due to weaknesses in the MD5 checksum design. If RC4 is preferred over stronger encryption types, an attacker could exploit MD5 collisions to forge message integrity codes. This may lead to unauthorized message tampering. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5569 | 1 Redhat | 5 Ansible Automation Platform, Openshift Ironic, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-10-15 | 6.2 Medium |
| A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in the jaraco/zipp library, affecting all versions prior to 3.19.1. The vulnerability is triggered when processing a specially crafted zip file that leads to an infinite loop. This issue also impacts the zipfile module of CPython, as features from the third-party zipp library are later merged into CPython, and the affected code is identical in both projects. The infinite loop can be initiated through the use of functions affecting the `Path` module in both zipp and zipfile, such as `joinpath`, the overloaded division operator, and `iterdir`. Although the infinite loop is not resource exhaustive, it prevents the application from responding. The vulnerability was addressed in version 3.19.1 of jaraco/zipp. | ||||
| CVE-2023-3971 | 1 Redhat | 7 Ansible Automation Controller, Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer and 4 more | 2025-10-10 | 7.3 High |
| An HTML injection flaw was found in Controller in the user interface settings. This flaw allows an attacker to capture credentials by creating a custom login page by injecting HTML, resulting in a complete compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4380 | 1 Redhat | 6 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside and 3 more | 2025-10-10 | 6.3 Medium |
| A logic flaw exists in Ansible Automation platform. Whenever a private project is created with incorrect credentials, they are logged in plaintext. This flaw allows an attacker to retrieve the credentials from the log, resulting in the loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4237 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Cloud Billing, Ansible Collection | 2025-10-10 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform. When creating a new keypair, the ec2_key module prints out the private key directly to the standard output. This flaw allows an attacker to fetch those keys from the log files, compromising the system's confidentiality, integrity, and availability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5189 | 1 Redhat | 7 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer, Ansible Automation Platform Inside and 4 more | 2025-10-10 | 6.3 Medium |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in Ansible when extracting tarballs. An attacker could craft a malicious tarball so that when using the galaxy importer of Ansible Automation Hub, a symlink could be dropped on the disk, resulting in files being overwritten. | ||||
| CVE-2023-5115 | 2 Debian, Redhat | 7 Debian Linux, Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer and 4 more | 2025-10-10 | 6.3 Medium |
| An absolute path traversal attack exists in the Ansible automation platform. This flaw allows an attacker to craft a malicious Ansible role and make the victim execute the role. A symlink can be used to overwrite a file outside of the extraction path. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26791 | 2 Cure53, Redhat | 6 Dompurify, Ansible Automation Platform, Network Observ Optr and 3 more | 2025-10-07 | 4.5 Medium |
| DOMPurify before 3.2.4 has an incorrect template literal regular expression, sometimes leading to mutation cross-site scripting (mXSS). | ||||
| CVE-2024-56374 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 3 more | 2025-10-03 | 5.8 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.5, 5.0 before 5.0.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.18. Lack of upper-bound limit enforcement in strings passed when performing IPv6 validation could lead to a potential denial-of-service attack. The undocumented and private functions clean_ipv6_address and is_valid_ipv6_address are vulnerable, as is the django.forms.GenericIPAddressField form field. (The django.db.models.GenericIPAddressField model field is not affected.) | ||||
| CVE-2025-26699 | 3 Debian, Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Django, Ansible Automation Platform and 1 more | 2025-10-03 | 5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Django 5.1 before 5.1.7, 5.0 before 5.0.13, and 4.2 before 4.2.20. The django.utils.text.wrap() method and wordwrap template filter are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when used with very long strings. | ||||