Filtered by vendor Redhat Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openshift Subscriptions
Total 1202 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2012-3464 4 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Redhat, Rhel Sam and 1 more 5 1, Openshift, 1.1 and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/string/output_safety.rb in Ruby on Rails before 3.0.17, 3.1.x before 3.1.8, and 3.2.x before 3.2.8 might allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors involving a ' (quote) character.
CVE-2013-0156 5 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Debian, Redhat and 2 more 6 1, Debian Linux, Openshift and 3 more 2025-04-11 N/A
active_support/core_ext/hash/conversions.rb in Ruby on Rails before 2.3.15, 3.0.x before 3.0.19, 3.1.x before 3.1.10, and 3.2.x before 3.2.11 does not properly restrict casts of string values, which allows remote attackers to conduct object-injection attacks and execute arbitrary code, or cause a denial of service (memory and CPU consumption) involving nested XML entity references, by leveraging Action Pack support for (1) YAML type conversion or (2) Symbol type conversion.
CVE-2012-3463 4 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Redhat, Rhel Sam and 1 more 5 1, Openshift, 1.1 and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in actionpack/lib/action_view/helpers/form_tag_helper.rb in Ruby on Rails 3.x before 3.0.17, 3.1.x before 3.1.8, and 3.2.x before 3.2.8 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the prompt field to the select_tag helper.
CVE-2012-2126 3 Canonical, Redhat, Rubygems 5 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Mrg and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
RubyGems before 1.8.23 does not verify an SSL certificate, which allows remote attackers to modify a gem during installation via a man-in-the-middle attack.
CVE-2012-2125 3 Canonical, Redhat, Rubygems 5 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Mrg and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
RubyGems before 1.8.23 can redirect HTTPS connections to HTTP, which makes it easier for remote attackers to observe or modify a gem during installation via a man-in-the-middle attack.
CVE-2012-6074 3 Cloudbees, Jenkins, Redhat 3 Jenkins, Jenkins, Openshift 2025-04-11 N/A
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Jenkins before 1.491, Jenkins LTS before 1.480.1, and Jenkins Enterprise 1.424.x before 1.424.6.13, 1.447.x before 1.447.4.1, and 1.466.x before 1.466.10.1 allows remote authenticated users with write access to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2022-43844 2 Ibm, Redhat 2 Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift 2025-04-10 8.8 High
IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 20.12 through 21.0.3 is vulnerable to broken access control. A user is not correctly redirected to the platform log out screen when logging out of IBM RPA for Cloud Pak. IBM X-Force ID: 239081.
CVE-2022-41740 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Windows and 1 more 2025-04-10 4.6 Medium
IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 could allow an attacker with physical access to the system to obtain highly sensitive information from system memory. IBM X-Force ID: 238053.
CVE-2022-43573 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more 2025-04-09 3.1 Low
IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 is vulnerable to exposure of the name and email for the creator/modifier of platform level objects. IBM X-Force ID: 238678.
CVE-2023-0296 1 Redhat 1 Openshift 2025-04-04 5.3 Medium
The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw (CVE-2016-2183) was reported for the health checks port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy, hence this port might be considered as still vulnerable to the same type of vulnerability. The health checks on etcd grpc-proxy do not contain sensitive data (only metrics data), therefore the potential impact related to this vulnerability is minimal. The CVE-2023-0296 has been assigned to this issue to track the permanent fix in the etcd component.
CVE-2022-41721 2 Golang, Redhat 5 H2c, Acm, Migration Toolkit Applications and 2 more 2025-04-04 7.5 High
A request smuggling attack is possible when using MaxBytesHandler. When using MaxBytesHandler, the body of an HTTP request is not fully consumed. When the server attempts to read HTTP2 frames from the connection, it will instead be reading the body of the HTTP request, which could be attacker-manipulated to represent arbitrary HTTP2 requests.
CVE-2023-22863 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more 2025-04-03 5.9 Medium
IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12.0 through 21.0.2 defaults to HTTP in some RPA commands when the prefix is not explicitly specified in the URL. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 244109.
CVE-2023-22594 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more 2025-04-03 4.6 Medium
IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 20.12.0 through 21.0.4 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 244075.
CVE-2023-22592 2 Ibm, Redhat 2 Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift 2025-04-03 4 Medium
IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.1 through 21.0.4 could allow a local user to perform unauthorized actions due to insufficient permission settings. IBM X-Force ID: 244073.
CVE-2023-24422 2 Jenkins, Redhat 3 Script Security, Ocp Tools, Openshift 2025-04-02 8.8 High
A sandbox bypass vulnerability involving map constructors in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1228.vd93135a_2fb_25 and earlier allows attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM.
CVE-2023-0229 1 Redhat 1 Openshift 2025-04-01 6.3 Medium
A flaw was found in github.com/openshift/apiserver-library-go, used in OpenShift 4.12 and 4.11, that contains an issue that can allow low-privileged users to set the seccomp profile for pods they control to "unconfined." By default, the seccomp profile used in the restricted-v2 Security Context Constraint (SCC) is "runtime/default," allowing users to disable seccomp for pods they can create and modify.
CVE-2022-43922 2 Ibm, Redhat 2 App Connect Enterprise Certified Container, Openshift 2025-03-26 5.3 Medium
IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 could disclose sensitive information to an attacker due to a weak hash of an API Key in the configuration. IBM X-Force ID: 241583.
CVE-2022-41731 2 Ibm, Redhat 2 Watson Knowledge Catalog On Cloud Pak For Data, Openshift 2025-03-25 8.6 High
IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog on Cloud Pak for Data 4.5.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 237402.
CVE-2022-42439 4 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft and 1 more 6 Aix, App Connect Enterprise, App Connect Enterprise Certified Container and 3 more 2025-03-25 6.8 Medium
IBM App Connect Enterprise 11.0.0.17 through 11.0.0.19 and 12.0.4.0 and 12.0.5.0 contains an unspecified vulnerability in the Discovery Connector nodes which may cause a 3rd party system’s credentials to be exposed to a privileged attacker. IBM X-Force ID: 238211.
CVE-2023-25725 3 Debian, Haproxy, Redhat 6 Debian Linux, Haproxy, Ceph Storage and 3 more 2025-03-20 9.1 Critical
HAProxy before 2.7.3 may allow a bypass of access control because HTTP/1 headers are inadvertently lost in some situations, aka "request smuggling." The HTTP header parsers in HAProxy may accept empty header field names, which could be used to truncate the list of HTTP headers and thus make some headers disappear after being parsed and processed for HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1. For HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, the impact is limited because the headers disappear before being parsed and processed, as if they had not been sent by the client. The fixed versions are 2.7.3, 2.6.9, 2.5.12, 2.4.22, 2.2.29, and 2.0.31.