Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openshift
Subscriptions
Total
1129 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-1857 | 3 Redhat, Rhel Sam, Rubyonrails | 5 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, 1.4 and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The sanitize helper in lib/action_controller/vendor/html-scanner/html/sanitizer.rb in the Action Pack component in Ruby on Rails before 2.3.18, 3.0.x and 3.1.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.13 does not properly handle encoded : (colon) characters in URLs, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a crafted scheme name, as demonstrated by including a : sequence. | ||||
| CVE-2013-0155 | 5 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Debian, Redhat and 2 more | 6 1, Debian Linux, Openshift and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Ruby on Rails 3.0.x before 3.0.19, 3.1.x before 3.1.10, and 3.2.x before 3.2.11 does not properly consider differences in parameter handling between the Active Record component and the JSON implementation, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended database-query restrictions and perform NULL checks or trigger missing WHERE clauses via a crafted request, as demonstrated by certain "[nil]" values, a related issue to CVE-2012-2660 and CVE-2012-2694. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5371 | 2 Redhat, Ruby-lang | 2 Openshift, Ruby | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Ruby (aka CRuby) 1.9 before 1.9.3-p327 and 2.0 before r37575 computes hash values without properly restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via crafted input to an application that maintains a hash table, as demonstrated by a universal multicollision attack against a variant of the MurmurHash2 algorithm, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-4815. | ||||
| CVE-2013-1855 | 3 Redhat, Rhel Sam, Rubyonrails | 5 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, 1.4 and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The sanitize_css method in lib/action_controller/vendor/html-scanner/html/sanitizer.rb in the Action Pack component in Ruby on Rails before 2.3.18, 3.0.x and 3.1.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.13 does not properly handle \n (newline) characters, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via crafted Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) token sequences. | ||||
| CVE-2013-1854 | 3 Redhat, Rhel Sam, Rubyonrails | 5 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, 1.4 and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The Active Record component in Ruby on Rails 2.3.x before 2.3.18, 3.1.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.13 processes certain queries by converting hash keys to symbols, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted input to a where method. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4330 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 10 Camel, Fuse Esb Enterprise, Fuse Management Console and 7 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Camel before 2.9.7, 2.10.0 before 2.10.7, 2.11.0 before 2.11.2, and 2.12.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary simple language expressions by including "$simple{}" in a CamelFileName message header to a (1) FILE or (2) FTP producer. | ||||
| CVE-2014-1869 | 2 Redhat, Zeroclipboard Project | 2 Openshift, Zeroclipboard | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ZeroClipboard.swf in ZeroClipboard before 1.3.2, as maintained by Jon Rohan and James M. Greene, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to certain SWF query parameters (aka loaderInfo.parameters). | ||||
| CVE-2022-43844 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift | 2025-04-10 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 20.12 through 21.0.3 is vulnerable to broken access control. A user is not correctly redirected to the platform log out screen when logging out of IBM RPA for Cloud Pak. IBM X-Force ID: 239081. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41740 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Windows and 1 more | 2025-04-10 | 4.6 Medium |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 could allow an attacker with physical access to the system to obtain highly sensitive information from system memory. IBM X-Force ID: 238053. | ||||
| CVE-2025-30204 | 1 Redhat | 19 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Cryostat and 16 more | 2025-04-10 | 7.5 High |
| golang-jwt is a Go implementation of JSON Web Tokens. Starting in version 3.2.0 and prior to versions 5.2.2 and 4.5.2, the function parse.ParseUnverified splits (via a call to strings.Split) its argument (which is untrusted data) on periods. As a result, in the face of a malicious request whose Authorization header consists of Bearer followed by many period characters, a call to that function incurs allocations to the tune of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument), with a constant factor of about 16. This issue is fixed in 5.2.2 and 4.5.2. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43573 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2025-04-09 | 3.1 Low |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 is vulnerable to exposure of the name and email for the creator/modifier of platform level objects. IBM X-Force ID: 238678. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0296 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2025-04-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw (CVE-2016-2183) was reported for the health checks port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy, hence this port might be considered as still vulnerable to the same type of vulnerability. The health checks on etcd grpc-proxy do not contain sensitive data (only metrics data), therefore the potential impact related to this vulnerability is minimal. The CVE-2023-0296 has been assigned to this issue to track the permanent fix in the etcd component. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41721 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 5 H2c, Acm, Migration Toolkit Applications and 2 more | 2025-04-04 | 7.5 High |
| A request smuggling attack is possible when using MaxBytesHandler. When using MaxBytesHandler, the body of an HTTP request is not fully consumed. When the server attempts to read HTTP2 frames from the connection, it will instead be reading the body of the HTTP request, which could be attacker-manipulated to represent arbitrary HTTP2 requests. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22863 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2025-04-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12.0 through 21.0.2 defaults to HTTP in some RPA commands when the prefix is not explicitly specified in the URL. This could allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information using man in the middle techniques. IBM X-Force ID: 244109. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22594 | 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat | 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more | 2025-04-03 | 4.6 Medium |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 20.12.0 through 21.0.4 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 244075. | ||||
| CVE-2023-22592 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift | 2025-04-03 | 4 Medium |
| IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 21.0.1 through 21.0.4 could allow a local user to perform unauthorized actions due to insufficient permission settings. IBM X-Force ID: 244073. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24422 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 3 Script Security, Ocp Tools, Openshift | 2025-04-02 | 8.8 High |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability involving map constructors in Jenkins Script Security Plugin 1228.vd93135a_2fb_25 and earlier allows attackers with permission to define and run sandboxed scripts, including Pipelines, to bypass the sandbox protection and execute arbitrary code in the context of the Jenkins controller JVM. | ||||
| CVE-2023-0229 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2025-04-01 | 6.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in github.com/openshift/apiserver-library-go, used in OpenShift 4.12 and 4.11, that contains an issue that can allow low-privileged users to set the seccomp profile for pods they control to "unconfined." By default, the seccomp profile used in the restricted-v2 Security Context Constraint (SCC) is "runtime/default," allowing users to disable seccomp for pods they can create and modify. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43922 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 App Connect Enterprise Certified Container, Openshift | 2025-03-26 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 could disclose sensitive information to an attacker due to a weak hash of an API Key in the configuration. IBM X-Force ID: 241583. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41731 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 Watson Knowledge Catalog On Cloud Pak For Data, Openshift | 2025-03-25 | 8.6 High |
| IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog on Cloud Pak for Data 4.5.0 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify or delete information in the back-end database. IBM X-Force ID: 237402. | ||||
ReportizFlow