Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
847 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2021-41111 | 1 Pagerduty | 1 Rundeck | 2025-04-23 | 6.4 Medium |
Rundeck is an open source automation service with a web console, command line tools and a WebAPI. Prior to versions 3.4.5 and 3.3.15, an authenticated user with authorization to read webhooks in one project can craft a request to reveal Webhook definitions and tokens in another project. The user could use the revealed webhook tokens to trigger webhooks. Severity depends on trust level of authenticated users and whether any webhooks exist that trigger sensitive actions. There are patches for this vulnerability in versions 3.4.5 and 3.3.15. There are currently no known workarounds. | ||||
CVE-2022-31027 | 1 Jupyter | 1 Oauthenticator | 2025-04-23 | 4.2 Medium |
OAuthenticator is an OAuth token library for the JupyerHub login handler. CILogonOAuthenticator is provided by the OAuthenticator package, and lets users log in to a JupyterHub via CILogon. This is primarily used to restrict a JupyterHub only to users of a given institute. The allowed_idps configuration trait of CILogonOAuthenticator is documented to be a list of domains that indicate the institutions whose users are authorized to access this JupyterHub. This authorization is validated by ensuring that the *email* field provided to us by CILogon has a *domain* that matches one of the domains listed in `allowed_idps`.If `allowed_idps` contains `berkeley.edu`, you might expect only users with valid current credentials provided by University of California, Berkeley to be able to access the JupyterHub. However, CILogonOAuthenticator does *not* verify which provider is used by the user to login, only the email address provided. So a user can login with a GitHub account that has email set to `<something>@berkeley.edu`, and that will be treated exactly the same as someone logging in using the UC Berkeley official Identity Provider. The patch fixing this issue makes a *breaking change* in how `allowed_idps` is interpreted. It's no longer a list of domains, but configuration representing the `EntityID` of the IdPs that are allowed, picked from the [list maintained by CILogon](https://cilogon.org/idplist/). Users are advised to upgrade. | ||||
CVE-2024-2346 | 1 Ninjateam | 1 Filebird | 2025-04-23 | 5.4 Medium |
The FileBird – WordPress Media Library Folders & File Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 5.6.3 via folder deletion due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with author access or higher, to delete folders created by other users and make their file uploads visible. | ||||
CVE-2024-39897 | 1 Zotregistry | 1 Zot | 2025-04-23 | 4.3 Medium |
zot is an OCI image registry. Prior to 2.1.0, the cache driver `GetBlob()` allows read access to any blob without access control check. If a Zot `accessControl` policy allows users read access to some repositories but restricts read access to other repositories and `dedupe` is enabled (it is enabled by default), then an attacker who knows the name of an image and the digest of a blob (that they do not have read access to), they may maliciously read it via a second repository they do have read access to. This attack is possible because [`ImageStore.CheckBlob()` calls `checkCacheBlob()`](https://github.com/project-zot/zot/blob/v2.1.0-rc2/pkg/storage/imagestore/imagestore.go#L1158-L1159) to find the blob a global cache by searching for the digest. If it is found, it is copied to the user requested repository with `copyBlob()`. The attack may be mitigated by configuring "dedupe": false in the "storage" settings. The vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.0. | ||||
CVE-2023-44981 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 4 Zookeeper, Debian Linux, Amq Broker and 1 more | 2025-04-23 | 9.1 Critical |
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache ZooKeeper. If SASL Quorum Peer authentication is enabled in ZooKeeper (quorum.auth.enableSasl=true), the authorization is done by verifying that the instance part in SASL authentication ID is listed in zoo.cfg server list. The instance part in SASL auth ID is optional and if it's missing, like 'eve@EXAMPLE.COM', the authorization check will be skipped. As a result an arbitrary endpoint could join the cluster and begin propagating counterfeit changes to the leader, essentially giving it complete read-write access to the data tree. Quorum Peer authentication is not enabled by default. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.9.1, 3.8.3, 3.7.2, which fixes the issue. Alternately ensure the ensemble election/quorum communication is protected by a firewall as this will mitigate the issue. See the documentation for more details on correct cluster administration. | ||||
CVE-2022-38765 | 1 Canon | 1 Vitrea View | 2025-04-23 | 6.5 Medium |
Canon Medical Informatics Vitrea Vision 7.7.76.1 does not adequately enforce access controls. An authenticated user is able to gain unauthorized access to imaging records by tampering with the vitrea-view/studies/search patientId parameter. | ||||
CVE-2025-42605 | 2025-04-23 | N/A | ||
This vulnerability exists in Meon Bidding Solutions due to improper authorization controls on certain API endpoints for the initiation, modification, or cancellation operations. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating parameter in the API request body to gain unauthorized access to other user accounts. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow remote attacker to perform authorized manipulation of data associated with other user accounts. | ||||
CVE-2025-3519 | 2025-04-23 | N/A | ||
An authorization bypass in Unblu Spark allows a participant of a conversation to replace an existing, uploaded file. Every uploaded file in Unblu gets assigned with a randomly generated Universally Unique ID (UUID). In case a participant of this or another conversation gets access to such a file ID, it can be used to replace the file without changing the file name and details or the name of the user who uploaded the file. During the upload, file interception and allowed file type rules are still applied correctly. | ||||
CVE-2022-29159 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Deck | 2025-04-22 | 5 Medium |
Nextcloud Deck is a Kanban-style project & personal management tool for Nextcloud. In versions prior to 1.4.8, 1.5.6, and 1.6.1, an authenticated user can move stacks with cards from their own board to a board of another user. The Nextcloud Deck app contains a patch for this issue in versions 1.4.8, 1.5.6, and 1.6.1. There are no known currently-known workarounds available. | ||||
CVE-2022-31131 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Mail | 2025-04-22 | 5.4 Medium |
Nextcloud mail is a Mail app for the Nextcloud home server product. Versions of Nextcloud mail prior to 1.12.2 were found to be missing user account ownership checks when performing tasks related to mail attachments. Attachments may have been exposed to incorrect system users. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Mail app is upgraded to 1.12.2. There are no known workarounds for this issue. ### Workarounds No workaround available ### References * [Pull request](https://github.com/nextcloud/mail/pull/6600) * [HackerOne](https://hackerone.com/reports/1579820) ### For more information If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: * Create a post in [nextcloud/security-advisories](https://github.com/nextcloud/security-advisories/discussions) * Customers: Open a support ticket at [support.nextcloud.com](https://support.nextcloud.com) | ||||
CVE-2022-31295 | 1 Razormist | 1 Online Discussion Forum Site | 2025-04-22 | 7.5 High |
An issue in the delete_post() function of Online Discussion Forum Site 1 allows unauthenticated attackers to arbitrarily delete posts. | ||||
CVE-2025-22931 | 2025-04-21 | 7.5 High | ||
An insecure direct object reference (IDOR) in the component /assets/stafffiles of OS4ED openSIS v7.0 to v9.1 allows unauthenticated attackers to access files uploaded by staff members. | ||||
CVE-2017-15208 | 1 Kanboard | 1 Kanboard | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
In Kanboard before 1.0.47, by altering form data, an authenticated user can remove automatic actions from a private project of another user. | ||||
CVE-2017-15207 | 1 Kanboard | 1 Kanboard | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
In Kanboard before 1.0.47, by altering form data, an authenticated user can edit tasks of a private project of another user. | ||||
CVE-2017-15203 | 1 Kanboard | 1 Kanboard | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
In Kanboard before 1.0.47, by altering form data, an authenticated user can remove categories from a private project of another user. | ||||
CVE-2017-15211 | 1 Kanboard | 1 Kanboard | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
In Kanboard before 1.0.47, by altering form data, an authenticated user can add an external link to a private project of another user. | ||||
CVE-2017-15200 | 1 Kanboard | 1 Kanboard | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
In Kanboard before 1.0.47, by altering form data, an authenticated user can add a new task to a private project of another user. | ||||
CVE-2017-0882 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
Multiple versions of GitLab expose sensitive user credentials when assigning a user to an issue or merge request. A fix was included in versions 8.15.8, 8.16.7, and 8.17.4, which were released on March 20th 2017 at 23:59 UTC. | ||||
CVE-2017-15196 | 1 Kanboard | 1 Kanboard | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
In Kanboard before 1.0.47, by altering form data, an authenticated user can remove columns from a private project of another user. | ||||
CVE-2017-15199 | 1 Kanboard | 1 Kanboard | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
In Kanboard before 1.0.47, by altering form data, an authenticated user can edit metadata of a private project of another user, as demonstrated by Name, Email, Identifier, and Description. |