ReportizFlow
Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
233 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-11486 | 1 Code4berry | 1 Decoration Management System | 2024-12-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Code4Berry Decoration Management System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /decoration/admin/user_permission.php of the component User Permission Handler. The manipulation leads to permission issues. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39576 | 1 Dell | 1 Power Manager | 2024-11-26 | 8.8 High |
| Dell Power Manager (DPM), versions 3.15.0 and prior, contains an Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution and Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45759 | 1 Dell | 1 Data Domain Operating System | 2024-11-26 | 6.8 Medium |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions prior to 8.1.0.0, 7.13.1.10, 7.10.1.40, and 7.7.5.50, contains an escalation of privilege vulnerability. A local low privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized execution of certain commands to overwrite system config of the application. Exploitation may lead to denial of service of system. | ||||
| CVE-2023-26280 | 1 Ibm | 1 Jazz Foundation | 2024-11-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Jazz Foundation 7.0.2 and 7.0.3 could allow a user to change their dashboard using a specially crafted HTTP request due to improper access control. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45187 | 1 Mage | 1 Mage-ai | 2024-11-25 | 7.1 High |
| Guest users in the Mage AI framework that remain logged in after their accounts are deleted, are mistakenly given high privileges and specifically given access to remotely execute arbitrary code through the Mage AI terminal server | ||||
| CVE-2024-10978 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-22 | 4.2 Medium |
| Incorrect privilege assignment in PostgreSQL allows a less-privileged application user to view or change different rows from those intended. An attack requires the application to use SET ROLE, SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION, or an equivalent feature. The problem arises when an application query uses parameters from the attacker or conveys query results to the attacker. If that query reacts to current_setting('role') or the current user ID, it may modify or return data as though the session had not used SET ROLE or SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION. The attacker does not control which incorrect user ID applies. Query text from less-privileged sources is not a concern here, because SET ROLE and SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION are not sandboxes for unvetted queries. Versions before PostgreSQL 17.1, 16.5, 15.9, 14.14, 13.17, and 12.21 are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9476 | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in Grafana Labs Grafana OSS and Enterprise allows Privilege Escalation allows users to gain access to resources from other organizations within the same Grafana instance via the Grafana Cloud Migration Assistant.This vulnerability will only affect users who utilize the Organizations feature to isolate resources on their Grafana instance. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52442 | 1 Userplus | 1 Userplus | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Incorrect Privilege Assignment vulnerability in Userplus UserPlus allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects UserPlus: from n/a through 2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41139 | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High | ||
| Incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability exists in SKYSEA Client View Ver.6.010.06 to Ver.19.210.04e. If a user who can log in to the PC where the product's Windows client is installed places a specially crafted DLL file in a specific folder, arbitrary code may be executed with SYSTEM privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40433 | 1 Tencent | 1 Wechat | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Insecure Permissions vulnerability in Tencent wechat v.8.0.37 allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the web-view component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38278 | 1 Siemens | 32 Ruggedcom Ros Rmc8388, Ruggedcom Ros Rmc8388nc, Ruggedcom Ros Rs416ncv2 and 29 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.6 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.9.0). The affected products with IP forwarding enabled wrongly make available certain remote services in non-managed VLANs, even if these services are not intentionally activated. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to create a remote shell to the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37293 | 2 Amazon, Awslabs | 2 Aws Deployment Framework, Aws-deployment-framework | 2024-11-21 | 7.6 High |
| The AWS Deployment Framework (ADF) is a framework to manage and deploy resources across multiple AWS accounts and regions within an AWS Organization. ADF allows for staged, parallel, multi-account, cross-region deployments of applications or resources via the structure defined in AWS Organizations while taking advantage of services such as AWS CodePipeline, AWS CodeBuild, and AWS CodeCommit to alleviate the heavy lifting and management compared to a traditional CI/CD setup. ADF contains a bootstrap process that is responsible to deploy ADF's bootstrap stacks to facilitate multi-account cross-region deployments. The ADF bootstrap process relies on elevated privileges to perform this task. Two versions of the bootstrap process exist; a code-change driven pipeline using AWS CodeBuild and an event-driven state machine using AWS Lambda. If an actor has permissions to change the behavior of the CodeBuild project or the Lambda function, they would be able to escalate their privileges. Prior to version 4.0.0, the bootstrap CodeBuild role provides access to the `sts:AssumeRole` operation without further restrictions. Therefore, it is able to assume into any AWS Account in the AWS Organization with the elevated privileges provided by the cross-account access role. By default, this role is not restricted when it is created by AWS Organizations, providing Administrator level access to the AWS resources in the AWS Account. The patches for this issue are included in `aws-deployment-framework` version 4.0.0. As a temporary mitigation, add a permissions boundary to the roles created by ADF in the management account. The permissions boundary should deny all IAM and STS actions. This permissions boundary should be in place until you upgrade ADF or bootstrap a new account. While the permissions boundary is in place, the account management and bootstrapping of accounts are unable to create, update, or assume into roles. This mitigates the privilege escalation risk, but also disables ADF's ability to create, manage, and bootstrap accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37134 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an improper privilege management vulnerability. A local high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to gain root-level access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37132 | 1 Dell | 1 Powerscale Onefs | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| Dell PowerScale OneFS versions 8.2.2.x through 9.8.0.0 contain an incorrect privilege assignment vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service and Elevation of privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36587 | 1 Dnscrypt | 1 Dnscrypt-proxy | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Insecure permissions in DNSCrypt-proxy v2.0.0alpha9 to v2.1.5 allows non-privileged attackers to escalate privileges to root via overwriting the binary dnscrypt-proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36534 | 2024-11-21 | 8.4 High | ||
| Insecure permissions in hwameistor v0.14.3 allows attackers to access sensitive data and escalate privileges by obtaining the service account's token. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31912 | 1 Ibm | 2 Mq, Mq Appliance | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM MQ 9.3 LTS and 9.3 CD could allow an authenticated user to escalate their privileges under certain configurations due to incorrect privilege assignment. IBM X-Force ID: 289894. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31771 | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High | ||
| Insecure Permission vulnerability in TotalAV v.6.0.740 allows a local attacker to escalate privileges via a crafted file | ||||
| CVE-2024-31760 | 2024-11-21 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| An issue in sanluan flipped-aurora gin-vue-admin 2.4.x allows an attacker to escalate privileges via the Session Expiration component. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27460 | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium | ||
| A privilege escalation exists in the updater for Plantronics Hub 3.25.1 and below. | ||||