Filtered by vendor Suse
Subscriptions
Total
1233 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-32199 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager, where after removing a custom GlobalRole that gives administrative access or the corresponding binding, the user still retains access to clusters. This only affects custom Global Roles that have a * on * in * rule for resources or have a * on * rule for non-resource URLs | ||||
| CVE-2025-54470 | 1 Suse | 1 Neuvector | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| This vulnerability affects NeuVector deployments only when the Report anonymous cluster data option is enabled. When this option is enabled, NeuVector sends anonymous telemetry data to the telemetry server. In affected versions, NeuVector does not enforce TLS certificate verification when transmitting anonymous cluster data to the telemetry server. As a result, the communication channel is susceptible to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks, where an attacker could intercept or modify the transmitted data. Additionally, NeuVector loads the response of the telemetry server is loaded into memory without size limitation, which makes it vulnerable to a Denial of Service(DoS) attack | ||||
| CVE-2025-54468 | 2 Rancher, Suse | 2 Rancher, Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager whereby `Impersonate-Extra-*` headers are being sent to an external entity, for example `amazonaws.com`, via the `/meta/proxy` Rancher endpoint. These headers may contain identifiable and/or sensitive information e.g. email addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54467 | 2 Neuvector, Suse | 2 Neuvector, Neuvector | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| When a Java command with password parameters is executed and terminated by NeuVector for Process rule violation the password will appear in the NeuVector security event log. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54469 | 1 Suse | 1 Neuvector | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical |
| A vulnerability was identified in NeuVector, where the enforcer used environment variables CLUSTER_RPC_PORT and CLUSTER_LAN_PORT to generate a command to be executed via popen, without first sanitising their values. The entry process of the enforcer container is the monitor process. When the enforcer container stops, the monitor process checks whether the consul subprocess has exited. To perform this check, the monitor process uses the popen function to execute a shell command that determines whether the ports used by the consul subprocess are still active. The values of environment variables CLUSTER_RPC_PORT and CLUSTER_LAN_PORT are used directly to compose shell commands via popen without validation or sanitization. This behavior could allow a malicious user to inject malicious commands through these variables within the enforcer container. | ||||
| CVE-2024-58260 | 2 Rancher, Suse | 2 Rancher, Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 7.6 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager where a missing server-side validation on the `.username` field in Rancher can allow users with update permissions on other User resources to cause denial of access for targeted accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53883 | 1 Suse | 4 Container Suse Manager 5.0, Manager, Manager Server and 1 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page (Basic XSS) vulnerability allows attackers to run arbitrary javascript via a reflected XSS issue in the search fields.This issue affects Container suse/manager/5.0/x86_64/server:latest: from ? before 5.0.28-150600.3.36.8; SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3: from ? before 4.3.88-150400.3.113.5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54471 | 1 Suse | 1 Neuvector | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| NeuVector used a hard-coded cryptographic key embedded in the source code. At compilation time, the key value was replaced with the secret key value and used to encrypt sensitive configurations when NeuVector stores the data. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22032 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in which an RKE1 cluster keeps constantly reconciling when secrets encryption configuration is enabled. When reconciling, the Kube API secret values are written in plaintext on the AppliedSpec. Cluster owners, Cluster members, and Project members (for projects within the cluster), all have RBAC permissions to view the cluster object from the apiserver. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22030 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher that can be exploited in narrow circumstances through a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. An attacker would need to have control of an expired domain or execute a DNS spoofing/hijacking attack against the domain to exploit this vulnerability. The targeted domain is the one used as the Rancher URL. | ||||
| CVE-2024-58269 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Rancher Manager, where sensitive information, including secret data, cluster import URLs, and registration tokens, is exposed to any entity with access to Rancher audit logs. | ||||
| CVE-2024-58267 | 2 Rancher, Suse | 2 Rancher, Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager whereby the SAML authentication from the Rancher CLI tool is vulnerable to phishing attacks. The custom authentication protocol for SAML-based providers can be abused to steal Rancher’s authentication tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53884 | 2 Neuvector, Suse | 2 Neuvector, Neuvector | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| NeuVector stores user passwords and API keys using a simple, unsalted hash. This method is vulnerable to rainbow table attack (offline attack where hashes of known passwords are precomputed). | ||||
| CVE-2024-58259 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified within Rancher Manager in which it did not enforce request body size limits on certain public (unauthenticated) and authenticated API endpoints. This allows a malicious user to exploit this by sending excessively large payloads, which are fully loaded into memory during processing, leading to Denial of Service (DoS). | ||||
| CVE-2025-53882 | 1 Suse | 1 Opensuse Tumbleweed | 2026-04-15 | 4.4 Medium |
| A Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision vulnerability in the logrotate configuration for openSUSE mailman3 package allows the mailman user to sent SIGHUP to arbitrary processes. This issue affects openSUSE Tumbleweed: from ? before 3.3.10-2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52281 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 8.9 High |
| A: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation vulnerability in SUSE rancher allows a malicious actor to perform a Stored XSS attack through the cluster description field. This issue affects rancher: from 2.9.0 before 2.9.4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52280 | 1 Suse | 1 Rancher | 2026-04-15 | 7.7 High |
| A Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in SUSE rancher which allows users to watch resources they are not allowed to access, when they have at least some generic permissions on the type. This issue affects rancher: before 2175e09, before 6e30359, before c744f0b. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49504 | 1 Suse | 1 Opensuse Tumbleweed | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| grub2 allowed attackers with access to the grub shell to access files on the encrypted disks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53880 | 1 Suse | 3 Manager, Manager Proxy, Manager Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Path Traversal vulnerability in the tftpsync/add and tftpsync/delete scripts allows a remote attacker on an adjacent network to write or delete files on the filesystem with the privileges of the unprivileged wwwrun user. Although the endpoint is unauthenticated, access is restricted to a list of allowed IP addresses. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12087 | 8 Almalinux, Archlinux, Gentoo and 5 more | 26 Almalinux, Arch Linux, Linux and 23 more | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| A path traversal vulnerability exists in rsync. It stems from behavior enabled by the `--inc-recursive` option, a default-enabled option for many client options and can be enabled by the server even if not explicitly enabled by the client. When using the `--inc-recursive` option, a lack of proper symlink verification coupled with deduplication checks occurring on a per-file-list basis could allow a server to write files outside of the client's intended destination directory. A malicious server could write malicious files to arbitrary locations named after valid directories/paths on the client. | ||||
ReportizFlow