ReportizFlow
Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
344468 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-35812 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-06-04 | 5.5 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1970 | 2024-05-29 | 0.0 Low | ||
| The originally reported issue in https://github.com/syedsohaibkarim/OpenRedirect-Keycloak18.0.0 is a known misconfiguration, and recommendation already exists in the Keycloak documentation to mitigate the issue: https://www.keycloak.org/docs/latest/server_admin/index.html#open-redirectors. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35802 | 2024-05-28 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52734 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-05-28 | 5.5 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47487 | 2024-05-28 | 0.0 Low | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47377 | 2024-05-28 | 0.0 Low | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3205 | 2024-05-27 | 0.0 Low | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: The maintainer identified an error in the libyaml fuzzers. It is not possible to reproduce nor exploit the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35923 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35820 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27430 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27428 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27427 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27426 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27425 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27424 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27423 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27422 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27421 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27420 | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47411 | 2024-05-25 | 0.0 Low | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||