Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Jboss Fuse
Subscriptions
Total
564 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2020-10740 | 1 Redhat | 6 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Cd, Jboss Fuse and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.6 Medium |
A vulnerability was found in Wildfly in versions before 20.0.0.Final, where a remote deserialization attack is possible in the Enterprise Application Beans(EJB) due to lack of validation/filtering capabilities in wildfly. | ||||
CVE-2020-10734 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Fuse, Keycloak, Openshift Application Runtimes and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 Low |
A vulnerability was found in keycloak in the way that the OIDC logout endpoint does not have CSRF protection. Versions shipped with Red Hat Fuse 7, Red Hat Single Sign-on 7, and Red Hat Openshift Application Runtimes are believed to be vulnerable. | ||||
CVE-2020-10719 | 2 Netapp, Redhat | 12 Active Iq Unified Manager, Oncommand Insight, Oncommand Workflow Automation and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
A flaw was found in Undertow in versions before 2.1.1.Final, regarding the processing of invalid HTTP requests with large chunk sizes. This flaw allows an attacker to take advantage of HTTP request smuggling. | ||||
CVE-2020-10718 | 1 Redhat | 5 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Fuse, Jboss Single Sign On and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
A flaw was found in Wildfly before wildfly-embedded-13.0.0.Final, where the embedded managed process API has an exposed setting of the Thread Context Classloader (TCCL). This setting is exposed as a public method, which can bypass the security manager. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. | ||||
CVE-2020-10714 | 2 Netapp, Redhat | 13 Oncommand Insight, Codeready Studio, Descision Manager and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
A flaw was found in WildFly Elytron version 1.11.3.Final and before. When using WildFly Elytron FORM authentication with a session ID in the URL, an attacker could perform a session fixation attack. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability. | ||||
CVE-2020-10693 | 4 Ibm, Oracle, Quarkus and 1 more | 13 Websphere Application Server, Weblogic Server, Quarkus and 10 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
A flaw was found in Hibernate Validator version 6.1.2.Final. A bug in the message interpolation processor enables invalid EL expressions to be evaluated as if they were valid. This flaw allows attackers to bypass input sanitation (escaping, stripping) controls that developers may have put in place when handling user-controlled data in error messages. | ||||
CVE-2020-10688 | 1 Redhat | 7 Enterprise Linux, Fuse, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
A cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw was found in RESTEasy in versions before 3.11.1.Final and before 4.5.3.Final, where it did not properly handle URL encoding when the RESTEASY003870 exception occurs. An attacker could use this flaw to launch a reflected XSS attack. | ||||
CVE-2020-10687 | 1 Redhat | 6 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Fuse and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.8 Medium |
A flaw was discovered in all versions of Undertow before Undertow 2.2.0.Final, where HTTP request smuggling related to CVE-2017-2666 is possible against HTTP/1.x and HTTP/2 due to permitting invalid characters in an HTTP request. This flaw allows an attacker to poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack, or obtain sensitive information from request other than their own. | ||||
CVE-2020-10683 | 6 Canonical, Dom4j Project, Netapp and 3 more | 44 Ubuntu Linux, Dom4j, Oncommand Api Services and 41 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
dom4j before 2.0.3 and 2.1.x before 2.1.3 allows external DTDs and External Entities by default, which might enable XXE attacks. However, there is popular external documentation from OWASP showing how to enable the safe, non-default behavior in any application that uses dom4j. | ||||
CVE-2020-10673 | 5 Debian, Fasterxml, Netapp and 2 more | 40 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Steelstore Cloud Integrated Storage and 37 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to com.caucho.config.types.ResourceRef (aka caucho-quercus). | ||||
CVE-2020-10672 | 5 Debian, Fasterxml, Netapp and 2 more | 40 Debian Linux, Jackson-databind, Steelstore Cloud Integrated Storage and 37 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
FasterXML jackson-databind 2.x before 2.9.10.4 mishandles the interaction between serialization gadgets and typing, related to org.apache.aries.transaction.jms.internal.XaPooledConnectionFactory (aka aries.transaction.jms). | ||||
CVE-2019-9827 | 2 Hawt, Redhat | 4 Hawtio, Amq Broker, Jboss Amq and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
Hawt Hawtio through 2.5.0 is vulnerable to SSRF, allowing a remote attacker to trigger an HTTP request from an affected server to an arbitrary host via the initial /proxy/ substring of a URI. | ||||
CVE-2019-9518 | 11 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 8 more | 26 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 23 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a flood of empty frames, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
CVE-2019-9517 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 28 Http Server, Traffic Server, Mac Os X and 25 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to unconstrained interal data buffering, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
CVE-2019-9516 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 24 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. | ||||
CVE-2019-9515 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 36 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 33 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 44 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 41 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
CVE-2019-9513 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 25 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 22 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
CVE-2019-9512 | 6 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 3 more | 24 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to ping floods, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
CVE-2019-9511 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 29 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 26 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. |