Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
592 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-22318 | 1 Ibm | 1 I Access Client Solutions | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 Medium |
IBM i Access Client Solutions (ACS) 1.1.2 through 1.1.4 and 1.1.4.3 through 1.1.9.4 is vulnerable to NT LAN Manager (NTLM) hash disclosure by an attacker modifying UNC capable paths within ACS configuration files to point to a hostile server. If NTLM is enabled, the Windows operating system will try to authenticate using the current user's session. The hostile server could capture the NTLM hash information to obtain the user's credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 279091. | ||||
CVE-2024-21670 | 1 Hyperledger | 1 Ursa | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
Ursa is a cryptographic library for use with blockchains. The revocation schema that is part of the Ursa CL-Signatures implementations has a flaw that could impact the privacy guarantees defined by the AnonCreds verifiable credential model, allowing a malicious holder of a revoked credential to generate a valid Non-Revocation Proof for that credential as part of an AnonCreds presentation. A verifier may verify a credential from a holder as being "not revoked" when in fact, the holder's credential has been revoked. Ursa has moved to end-of-life status and no fix is expected. | ||||
CVE-2023-5962 | 1 Moxa | 20 Iologik E1210, Iologik E1210 Firmware, Iologik E1211 and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
A weak cryptographic algorithm vulnerability has been identified in ioLogik E1200 Series firmware versions v3.3 and prior. This vulnerability can help an attacker compromise the confidentiality of sensitive data. This vulnerability may lead an attacker to get unexpected authorization. | ||||
CVE-2023-5627 | 1 Moxa | 54 Nport 6150, Nport 6150-t, Nport 6150-t Firmware and 51 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
A vulnerability has been identified in NPort 6000 Series, making the authentication mechanism vulnerable. This vulnerability arises from the incorrect implementation of sensitive information protection, potentially allowing malicious users to gain unauthorized access to the web service. | ||||
CVE-2023-50939 | 1 Ibm | 1 Powersc | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 275129. | ||||
CVE-2023-50937 | 1 Ibm | 1 Powersc | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
IBM PowerSC 1.3, 2.0, and 2.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 275117. | ||||
CVE-2023-50481 | 1 Blinksocks | 1 Blinksocks | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
An issue was discovered in blinksocks version 3.3.8, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via weak encryption algorithms in the component /presets/ssr-auth-chain.js. | ||||
CVE-2023-50313 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 could provide weaker than expected security for outbound TLS connections caused by a failure to honor user configuration. IBM X-Force ID: 274812. | ||||
CVE-2023-4331 | 2 Broadcom, Intel | 3 Lsi Storage Authority, Raid Controller Web Interface, Raid Web Console 3 | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable has an insecure default TLS configuration that support obsolete and vulnerable TLS protocols | ||||
CVE-2023-4326 | 1 Broadcom | 2 Lsi Storage Authority, Raid Controller Web Interface | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
Broadcom RAID Controller web interface is vulnerable has an insecure default TLS configuration that supports obsolete SHA1-based ciphersuites | ||||
CVE-2023-46133 | 1 Entronad | 1 Cryptoes | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
CryptoES is a cryptography algorithms library compatible with ES6 and TypeScript. Prior to version 2.1.0, CryptoES PBKDF2 is 1,000 times weaker than originally specified in 1993, and at least 1,300,000 times weaker than current industry standard. This is because it both defaults to SHA1, a cryptographic hash algorithm considered insecure since at least 2005, and defaults to one single iteration, a 'strength' or 'difficulty' value specified at 1,000 when specified in 1993. PBKDF2 relies on iteration count as a countermeasure to preimage and collision attacks. If used to protect passwords, the impact is high. If used to generate signatures, the impact is high. Version 2.1.0 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, configure CryptoES to use SHA256 with at least 250,000 iterations. | ||||
CVE-2023-43635 | 1 Linuxfoundation | 1 Edge Virtualization Engine | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
Vault Key Sealed With SHA1 PCRs The measured boot solution implemented in EVE OS leans on a PCR locking mechanism. Different parts of the system update different PCR values in the TPM, resulting in a unique value for each PCR entry. These PCRs are then used in order to seal/unseal a key from the TPM which is used to encrypt/decrypt the “vault” directory. This “vault” directory is the most sensitive point in the system and as such, its content should be protected. This mechanism is noted in Zededa’s documentation as the “measured boot” mechanism, designed to protect said “vault”. The code that’s responsible for generating and fetching the key from the TPM assumes that SHA256 PCRs are used in order to seal/unseal the key, and as such their presence is being checked. The issue here is that the key is not sealed using SHA256 PCRs, but using SHA1 PCRs. This leads to several issues: • Machines that have their SHA256 PCRs enabled but SHA1 PCRs disabled, as well as not sealing their keys at all, meaning the “vault” is not protected from an attacker. • SHA1 is considered insecure and reduces the complexity level required to unseal the key in machines which have their SHA1 PCRs enabled. An attacker can very easily retrieve the contents of the “vault”, which will effectively render the “measured boot” mechanism meaningless. | ||||
CVE-2023-41928 | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium | ||
The device is observed to accept deprecated TLS protocols, increasing the risk of cryptographic weaknesses. | ||||
CVE-2023-41927 | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium | ||
The server supports at least one cipher suite which is on the NCSC-NL list of cipher suites to be phased out, increasing the risk of cryptographic weaknesses. | ||||
CVE-2023-40371 | 1 Ibm | 2 Aix, Vios | 2024-11-21 | 6.2 Medium |
IBM AIX 7.2, 7.3, VIOS 3.1's OpenSSH implementation could allow a non-privileged local user to access files outside of those allowed due to improper access controls. IBM X-Force ID: 263476. | ||||
CVE-2023-3350 | 1 Ayesa | 1 Ibermatica Rps | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
A Cryptographic Issue vulnerability has been found on IBERMATICA RPS, affecting version 2019. By firstly downloading the log file, an attacker could retrieve the SQL query sent to the application in plaint text. This log file contains the password hashes coded with AES-CBC-128 bits algorithm, which can be decrypted with a .NET function, obtaining the username's password in plain text. | ||||
CVE-2023-3089 | 1 Redhat | 18 Acm, Amq Streams, Container Native Virtualization and 15 more | 2024-11-21 | 7 High |
A compliance problem was found in the Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform. Red Hat discovered that, when FIPS mode was enabled, not all of the cryptographic modules in use were FIPS-validated. | ||||
CVE-2023-38730 | 1 Ibm | 1 Storage Copy Data Management | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
IBM Storage Copy Data Management 2.2.0.0 through 2.2.19.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 262268. | ||||
CVE-2023-38371 | 1 Ibm | 2 Security Access Manager, Security Verify Access Docker | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
IBM Security Access Manager Docker 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.7.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 261198. | ||||
CVE-2023-38361 | 2 Ibm, Linux | 2 Cics Tx, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
IBM CICS TX Advanced 10.1 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 260770. |