Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Total
21479 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2024-7522 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 9 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird and 6 more | 2024-08-12 | 9.1 Critical |
Editor code failed to check an attribute value. This could have led to an out-of-bounds read. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 129, Firefox ESR < 115.14, Firefox ESR < 128.1, Thunderbird < 128.1, and Thunderbird < 115.14. | ||||
CVE-2024-7521 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 9 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird and 6 more | 2024-08-12 | 9.8 Critical |
Incomplete WebAssembly exception handing could have led to a use-after-free. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 129, Firefox ESR < 115.14, Firefox ESR < 128.1, Thunderbird < 128.1, and Thunderbird < 115.14. | ||||
CVE-2024-7519 | 2 Mozilla, Redhat | 9 Firefox, Firefox Esr, Thunderbird and 6 more | 2024-08-12 | 8.8 High |
Insufficient checks when processing graphics shared memory could have led to memory corruption. This could be leveraged by an attacker to perform a sandbox escape. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 129, Firefox ESR < 115.14, Firefox ESR < 128.1, Thunderbird < 128.1, and Thunderbird < 115.14. | ||||
CVE-2024-41991 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 4 Django, Ansible Automation Platform, Satellite and 1 more | 2024-08-12 | 7.5 High |
An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.8 and 4.2 before 4.2.15. The urlize and urlizetrunc template filters, and the AdminURLFieldWidget widget, are subject to a potential denial-of-service attack via certain inputs with a very large number of Unicode characters. | ||||
CVE-2024-42226 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-08-12 | 5.5 Medium |
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-41989 | 2 Djangoproject, Redhat | 2 Django, Ansible Automation Platform | 2024-08-08 | 7.5 High |
An issue was discovered in Django 5.0 before 5.0.8 and 4.2 before 4.2.15. The floatformat template filter is subject to significant memory consumption when given a string representation of a number in scientific notation with a large exponent. | ||||
CVE-2024-6472 | 2 Redhat, The Document Foundation | 6 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 3 more | 2024-08-06 | 7.8 High |
Certificate Validation user interface in LibreOffice allows potential vulnerability. Signed macros are scripts that have been digitally signed by the developer using a cryptographic signature. When a document with a signed macro is opened a warning is displayed by LibreOffice before the macro is executed. Previously if verification failed the user could fail to understand the failure and choose to enable the macros anyway. This issue affects LibreOffice: from 24.2 before 24.2.5. | ||||
CVE-2024-7246 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Satellite, Satellite Capsule | 2024-08-06 | 4.8 Medium |
It's possible for a gRPC client communicating with a HTTP/2 proxy to poison the HPACK table between the proxy and the backend such that other clients see failed requests. It's also possible to use this vulnerability to leak other clients HTTP header keys, but not values. This occurs because the error status for a misencoded header is not cleared between header reads, resulting in subsequent (incrementally indexed) added headers in the first request being poisoned until cleared from the HPACK table. Please update to a fixed version of gRPC as soon as possible. This bug has been fixed in 1.58.3, 1.59.5, 1.60.2, 1.61.3, 1.62.3, 1.63.2, 1.64.3, 1.65.4. | ||||
CVE-2024-42460 | 2 Elliptic Project, Redhat | 4 Elliptic, Acm, Multicluster Engine and 1 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, ECDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing check for whether the leading bit of r and s is zero. | ||||
CVE-2024-42459 | 2 Elliptic Project, Redhat | 4 Elliptic, Acm, Multicluster Engine and 1 more | 2024-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, EDDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing signature length check, and thus zero-valued bytes can be removed or appended. | ||||
CVE-2024-35918 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-07-30 | 5.5 Medium |
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-38391 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-07-02 | 4.4 Medium |
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2023-52756 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-06-08 | 4.4 Medium |
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-35812 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-06-04 | 5.5 Medium |
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-35923 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-05-25 | 5.5 Medium |
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2023-52758 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-05-24 | 4.4 Medium |
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-35876 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-05-23 | 5.5 Medium |
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2024-26650 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2024-05-23 | 4.4 Medium |
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2023-52651 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Eus | 2024-05-02 | 5.5 Medium |
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
CVE-2022-27458 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Software Collections | 2024-05-02 | 7.5 High |
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2022-27447. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2022-27447. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2022-27447 instead of this candidate. |