ReportizFlow
Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
13274 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-32735 | 1 Chrimle | 1 Openapi-to-java-records-mustache-templates-parent | 2026-03-25 | N/A |
| openapi-to-java-records-mustache-templates allows users to generate Java Records from OpenAPI specifications. Starting in version 5.1.1 and prior to version 5.5.1, the parent POM file of this project (`openapi-to-java-records-mustache-templates-parent`), which is used to centralize plugin configurations for multiple unit-test modules, uses `maven-dependency-plugin` to unpack arbitrary `.mustache` files from the `openapi-to-java-records-mustache-templates` artifact (of the same version). While this parent POM file is not intended for external use, it is published, and could be used by anyone, and does not follow the best security practices. The risk, is that if `openapi-to-java-records-mustache-templates` would be compromised, and malicious `.mustache` files were to be included in the resulting JAR/artifact, users would unpack these files automatically during a dependency update. This is addressed in the v3.5.1 release of `openapi-to-java-records-mustache-templates-parent`. It is strongly recommended NOT to use the parent POM for external use. The `openapi-to-java-records-mustache-templates` module is the center of this project, and surrounding modules and configurations are not intended for production-use. These only exist for testing purposes and maintainability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-23489 | 2 Pluginsglpi, Teclib-edition | 2 Fields, Fields | 2026-03-24 | 9.1 Critical |
| Fields is a GLPI plugin that allows users to add custom fields on GLPI items forms. Prior to version 1.23.3, it is possible to execute arbitrary PHP code from users that are allowed to create dropdowns. This issue has been patched in version 1.23.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26474 | 2 Openatom, Openharmony | 2 Openharmony, Openharmony | 2026-03-24 | 3.3 Low |
| in OpenHarmony v5.0.3 and prior versions allow a local attacker cause information improper input. This vulnerability can be exploited only in restricted scenarios. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6969 | 2 Openatom, Openharmony | 2 Openharmony, Openharmony | 2026-03-24 | 5 Medium |
| in OpenHarmony v5.1.0 and prior versions allow a local attacker cause DOS through improper input. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66614 | 2 Apache, Apache Tomcat | 2 Tomcat, Apache Tomcat | 2026-03-24 | 7.6 High |
| Improper Input Validation vulnerability. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.14, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.49, from 9.0.0-M1 through 9.0.112. The following versions were EOL at the time the CVE was created but are known to be affected: 8.5.0 through 8.5.100. Older EOL versions are not affected. Tomcat did not validate that the host name provided via the SNI extension was the same as the host name provided in the HTTP host header field. If Tomcat was configured with more than one virtual host and the TLS configuration for one of those hosts did not require client certificate authentication but another one did, it was possible for a client to bypass the client certificate authentication by sending different host names in the SNI extension and the HTTP host header field. The vulnerability only applies if client certificate authentication is only enforced at the Connector. It does not apply if client certificate authentication is enforced at the web application. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.15 or later, 10.1.50 or later or 9.0.113 or later, which fix the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33065 | 1 Qualcomm | 91 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Fastconnect 6200 and 88 more | 2026-03-23 | 8.4 High |
| Memory corruption while taking snapshot when an offset variable is set by camera driver. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60012 | 1 Apache | 1 Livy | 2026-03-23 | 6.3 Medium |
| Malicious configuration can lead to unauthorized file access in Apache Livy. This issue affects Apache Livy 0.7.0 and 0.8.0 when connecting to Apache Spark 3.1 or later. A request that includes a Spark configuration value supported from Apache Spark version 3.1 can lead to users gaining access to files they do not have permissions to. For the vulnerability to be exploitable, the user needs to have access to Apache Livy's REST or JDBC interface and be able to send requests with arbitrary Spark configuration values. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.9.0 or later, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22204 | 2 Gvectors, Wordpress | 2 Wpdiscuz, Wordpress | 2026-03-23 | 3.7 Low |
| wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 contains an email header injection vulnerability that allows attackers to manipulate mail recipients by injecting malicious data into the comment_author_email cookie. Attackers can craft a malicious cookie value that, when processed through urldecode() and passed to wp_mail() functions, enables header injection to alter email recipients or inject additional headers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31900 | 2 Psf, Python | 2 Black, Black | 2026-03-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Black is the uncompromising Python code formatter. Black provides a GitHub action for formatting code. This action supports an option, use_pyproject: true, for reading the version of Black to use from the repository pyproject.toml. A malicious pull request could edit pyproject.toml to use a direct URL reference to a malicious repository. This could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the GitHub Action. Attackers could then gain access to secrets or permissions available in the context of the action. Version 26.3.0 fixes this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21310 | 1 Adobe | 4 Adobe Commerce, Commerce, Commerce B2b and 1 more | 2026-03-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in a security feature bypass, with limited impact to integrity. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21282 | 1 Adobe | 4 Adobe Commerce, Commerce, Commerce B2b and 1 more | 2026-03-20 | 5.3 Medium |
| Adobe Commerce versions 2.4.9-alpha3, 2.4.8-p3, 2.4.7-p8, 2.4.6-p13, 2.4.5-p15, 2.4.4-p16 and earlier are affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted input, causing limited impact to application availability. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30901 | 1 Zoom | 1 Rooms | 2026-03-20 | 7 High |
| Improper Input Validation in Zoom Rooms for Windows before 6.6.5 in Kiosk Mode may allow an authenticated user to conduct an escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25160 | 1 Tokuhirom | 2 Http::session2, Http\ | 2026-03-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| HTTP::Session2 versions through 1.09 for Perl does not validate the format of user provided session ids, enabling code injection or other impact depending on session backend. For example, if an application uses memcached for session storage, then it may be possible for a remote attacker to inject memcached commands in the session id value. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13327 | 2 Astral, Redhat | 3 Uv, Ai Inference Server, Openshift Ai | 2026-03-18 | 6.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in uv. This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute malicious code during package resolution or installation via specially crafted ZIP (Zipped Information Package) archives that exploit parsing differentials, requiring user interaction to install an attacker-controlled package. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14558 | 1 Freebsd | 1 Freebsd | 2026-03-17 | 7.2 High |
| The rtsol(8) and rtsold(8) programs do not validate the domain search list options provided in router advertisement messages; the option body is passed to resolvconf(8) unmodified. resolvconf(8) is a shell script which does not validate its input. A lack of quoting meant that shell commands pass as input to resolvconf(8) may be executed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20096 | 1 Intel | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in the UEFI firmware for some Intel Reference Platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable data manipulation. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20027 | 1 Intel | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in the UEFI WheaERST module for some Intel(R) reference platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20064 | 1 Intel | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in the UEFI FlashUcAcmSmm module for some Intel(R) reference platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20068 | 1 Intel | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in the UEFI ImcErrorHandler module for some Intel(R) reference platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20105 | 1 Intel | 1 Uefi Firmware | 2026-03-13 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in some UEFI firmware SMM module for the Intel(R) reference platforms may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. | ||||