Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openshift
Subscriptions
Total
1210 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-3195 | 2 Qemu, Redhat | 3 Qemu, Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-06-19 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in QEMU. When reading input audio in the virtio-snd device input callback, the `virtio_snd_pcm_in_cb` function did not check whether the iov could fit the data buffer, potentially leading to a heap out-of-bounds write. This issue exists due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-7730. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3196 | 2 Qemu, Redhat | 3 Qemu, Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-06-19 | 5.5 Medium |
| An integer overflow vulnerability was found in the virtio-snd device via PCM_INFO requests from the guest. A malicious guest can provide out-of-bounds stream counts, potentially leading to unbounded memory allocation on the host and a denial of service condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4878 | 2 Libcap Project, Redhat | 17 Libcap, Ai Inference Server, Discovery and 14 more | 2026-06-18 | 6.7 Medium |
| A flaw was found in libcap. A local unprivileged user can exploit a Time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the `cap_set_file()` function. This allows an attacker with write access to a parent directory to redirect file capability updates to an attacker-controlled file. By doing so, capabilities can be injected into or stripped from unintended executables, leading to privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12505 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-06-18 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in the cifs-utils package where the cifs.upcall helper fails to securely drop its root privileges before looking up user information inside a user-controlled environment. A local, low privileged attacker can exploit this by using a crafted request_key payload to trick the root-owned helper into entering a custom environment (namespace) containing a malicious NSS module. This forces the system to load the attacker's controlled NSS Module and configuration, allowing them to execute arbitrary commands as the root user, elevating their privileges and fully compromising the system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6893 | 1 Redhat | 6 Dracut, Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images and 3 more | 2026-06-18 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in dracut. A remote attacker on the adjacent network can exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) options, such as a malicious hostname, to a system using dracut's legacy DHCP path. These options are improperly handled and written into temporary shell scripts without proper escaping, leading to command injection. This allows the attacker to achieve root code execution within the initramfs, potentially compromising the system's boot and network behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10649 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Linux, Openshift | 2026-06-17 | 8.6 High |
| A flaw was found in Pacemaker. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an integer overflow vulnerability in the remote message decompression process. By sending a specially crafted compressed remote message before authentication, an attacker can cause memory corruption, leading to a denial of service (DoS) in the CIB remote listener. This can result in the affected service crashing. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1784 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-06-17 | 8.8 High |
| The Route OpenShift resource allows to define routes to make pods reachable at a subdomain through HAProxy. It was found that the checks performed on the spec.path YAML stanza in a Route document was insufficient and could allow a controlled injection of the HAProxy configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5419 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Gnutls, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. The PKCS#7 padding check, performed during decryption, was not constant-time. This timing side-channel could allow a remote attacker to potentially leak sensitive information about the padding bytes through observable timing differences. This vulnerability is a form of information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3832 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Gnutls, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by presenting a specially crafted Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) response during a TLS handshake. Due to a logic error in how gnutls processes multi-record OCSP responses, a client with OCSP verification enabled may incorrectly accept a revoked server certificate, potentially leading to a compromise of trust. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42015 | 1 Redhat | 7 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Hardened Images and 4 more | 2026-06-17 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. An off-by-one error exists in the PKCS#12 bag element bounds check. This vulnerability allows an remote attacker to write past the internal array of a PKCS#12 bag when appending to a bag that already contains 32 elements. This memory corruption could lead to a denial of service (DoS) or potentially other unspecified impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42014 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Hummingbird and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in GnuTLS. The `gnutls_pkcs11_token_set_pin` function, used for changing the Security Officer PIN, can lead to a use-after-free vulnerability. This occurs when an attacker attempts to change the PIN with a NULL old PIN for a token that lacks a protected authentication path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42013 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Gnutls, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. When validating certificates, an oversized Subject Alternative Name (SAN) could cause the validation process to incorrectly fall back to checking the Common Name (CN) field. This could allow a remote attacker to bypass proper certificate validation, potentially leading to spoofing or man-in-the-middle attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42012 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Gnutls, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by presenting a specially crafted certificate that contains Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) or Service (SRV) Subject Alternative Names (SANs). This could cause the certificate validation process to incorrectly fall back to checking DNS hostnames against the Common Name (CN), potentially allowing the attacker to spoof legitimate services or intercept sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5260 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Gnutls, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in libgnutls. A remote attacker, by sending an extremely short premaster secret during an RSA key exchange to a server using an RSA key backed by a PKCS#11 token, could trigger a short heap overread. This memory corruption vulnerability could lead to information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42011 | 1 Redhat | 7 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Hardened Images and 4 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. This vulnerability occurs because permitted name constraints were incorrectly ignored when previous Certificate Authorities (CAs) only had excluded name constraints. A remote attacker could exploit this to bypass critical name constraint checks during certificate validation. This bypass could lead to the acceptance of invalid certificates, potentially enabling spoofing or man-in-the-middle attacks against affected systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3833 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Gnutls, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. This vulnerability occurs because gnutls performs case-sensitive comparisons of `nameConstraints` labels, specifically for `dNSName` (DNS) or `rfc822Name` (email) constraints within `excludedSubtrees` or `permittedSubtrees`. A remote attacker can exploit this by crafting a leaf certificate with casing differences in the Subject Alternative Name (SAN), leading to a policy bypass where a certificate that should be rejected is instead accepted. This could result in unauthorized access or information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-2340 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 5 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform and 2 more | 2026-06-17 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Samba’s vfs_worm module. The module is intended to provide write-once, read-many (WORM) protections by preventing modification of files after a configurable grace period. Due to insufficient validation during rename operations, an authenticated user with write access to a share could overwrite a protected file by renaming a newly created file over the existing WORM-protected file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42010 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Gnutls, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. Servers configured with RSA-PSK (Rivest–Shamir–Adleman – Pre-Shared Key) wrongfully matched usernames containing a NUL character with truncated usernames. A remote attacker could exploit this by sending a specially crafted username, leading to an authentication bypass. This vulnerability allows an attacker to gain unauthorized access by circumventing the authentication process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42009 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 18 Gnutls, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 15 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in gnutls. A remote attacker could exploit an issue in the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) packet reordering logic. The comparator function, responsible for ordering DTLS packets by sequence numbers, did not correctly handle packets with duplicate sequence numbers. This could lead to unstable packet ordering or undefined behavior, resulting in a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33846 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Gnutls, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 5 more | 2026-06-17 | 7.5 High |
| A heap buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the DTLS handshake fragment reassembly logic of GnuTLS. The issue arises in merge_handshake_packet() where incoming handshake fragments are matched and merged based solely on handshake type, without validating that the message_length field remains consistent across all fragments of the same logical message. An attacker can exploit this by sending crafted DTLS fragments with conflicting message_length values, causing the implementation to allocate a buffer based on a smaller initial fragment and subsequently write beyond its bounds using larger, inconsistent fragments. Because the merge operation does not enforce proper bounds checking against the allocated buffer size, this results in an out-of-bounds write on the heap. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication via the DTLS handshake path and can lead to application crashes or potential memory corruption. | ||||
ReportizFlow