Show plain JSON{"configurations": [{"nodes": [{"cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:o:blipcare:wi-fi_blood_pressure_monitor_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "AFBC8640-C65D-4A08-90C9-1DEAEE598C91", "versionEndIncluding": "bp700_10.1", "vulnerable": true}], "negate": false, "operator": "OR"}, {"cpeMatch": [{"criteria": "cpe:2.3:h:blipcare:wi-fi_blood_pressure_monitor:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "matchCriteriaId": "BB414505-7BE8-463E-B036-16B53ADED4AA", "vulnerable": false}], "negate": false, "operator": "OR"}], "operator": "AND"}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "Blipcare Wifi blood pressure monitor BP700 10.1 devices allow memory corruption that results in Denial of Service. When connected to the \"Blip\" open wireless connection provided by the device, if a large string is sent as a part of the HTTP request in any part of the HTTP headers, the device could become completely unresponsive. Presumably this happens as the memory footprint provided to this device is very small. According to the specs from Rezolt, the Wi-Fi module only has 256k of memory. As a result, an incorrect string copy operation using either memcpy, strcpy, or any of their other variants could result in filling up the memory space allocated to the function executing and this would result in memory corruption. To test the theory, one can modify the demo application provided by the Cypress WICED SDK and introduce an incorrect \"memcpy\" operation and use the compiled application on the evaluation board provided by Cypress semiconductors with exactly the same Wi-Fi SOC. The results were identical where the device would completely stop responding to any of the ping or web requests."}, {"lang": "es", "value": "El monitor de presi\u00f3n Wifi blood BP700 versi\u00f3n 10.1 de Blipcare, permite la corrupci\u00f3n de memoria que resulta en la Denegaci\u00f3n de Servicio. Cuando est\u00e1 conectado a la conexi\u00f3n inal\u00e1mbrica abierta \"Blip\" proporcionada por el dispositivo, si se env\u00eda una cadena larga como parte de la petici\u00f3n HTTP en cualquier parte de los encabezados HTTP, el dispositivo podr\u00eda dejar de responder por completo. Presuntamente esto sucede ya que la huella de memoria suministrada a este dispositivo es muy peque\u00f1a. De acuerdo con las especificaciones de Rezolt, el m\u00f3dulo Wi-Fi solo tiene 256k de memoria. Como resultado, una operaci\u00f3n de copia de cadena incorrecta que usando memcpy, strcpy o cualquiera de sus otras variantes podr\u00eda resultar en el llenado del espacio de memoria asignado a la funci\u00f3n que se ejecuta y esto podr\u00eda provocar una corrupci\u00f3n de la memoria. Para probar la teor\u00eda, uno puede modificar la aplicaci\u00f3n de demostraci\u00f3n provista por el WICED SDK de Cypress e introducir una operaci\u00f3n \"memcpy\" incorrecta y utilizar la aplicaci\u00f3n compilada en la placa de evaluaci\u00f3n suministrada por los semiconductores Cypress con exactamente el mismo SOC de Wi-Fi. Los resultados fueron id\u00e9nticos donde el dispositivo se detendr\u00eda completamente a cualquiera de las peticiones web o de ping."}], "id": "CVE-2017-11580", "lastModified": "2024-11-21T03:08:04.350", "metrics": {"cvssMetricV2": [{"acInsufInfo": false, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "cvssData": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "accessVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 6.1, "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "vectorString": "AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C", "version": "2.0"}, "exploitabilityScore": 6.5, "impactScore": 6.9, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary", "userInteractionRequired": false}], "cvssMetricV30": [{"cvssData": {"attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "ADJACENT_NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 6.5, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.0"}, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary"}]}, "published": "2019-07-02T21:15:10.010", "references": [{"source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": ["Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry"], "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153225/Blipcare-Clear-Text-Communication-Memory-Corruption.html"}, {"source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": ["Exploit", "Third Party Advisory"], "url": "https://github.com/ethanhunnt/IoT_vulnerabilities/blob/master/Blipcare_sec_issues.pdf"}, {"source": "cve@mitre.org", "tags": ["Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory"], "url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Jun/8"}, {"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": ["Third Party Advisory", "VDB Entry"], "url": "http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/153225/Blipcare-Clear-Text-Communication-Memory-Corruption.html"}, {"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": ["Exploit", "Third Party Advisory"], "url": "https://github.com/ethanhunnt/IoT_vulnerabilities/blob/master/Blipcare_sec_issues.pdf"}, {"source": "af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108", "tags": ["Mailing List", "Third Party Advisory"], "url": "https://seclists.org/bugtraq/2019/Jun/8"}], "sourceIdentifier": "cve@mitre.org", "vulnStatus": "Modified", "weaknesses": [{"description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-399"}], "source": "nvd@nist.gov", "type": "Primary"}]}