Filtered by vendor Nokia
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Netact
Subscriptions
Total
12 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2023-26061 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
An issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct before 22 FP2211. On the Scheduled Search tab under the Alarm Reports Dashboard page, users can create a script to inject XSS. Input validation was missing during creation of a scheduled task. For an external attacker, it is very difficult to exploit this, because a few dynamically created parameters such as Jsession-id, a CSRF token, and an Nxsrf token would be needed. The attack can realistically only be performed by an internal user. | ||||
CVE-2023-26060 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
An issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct before 22 FP2211. On the Working Set Manager page, users can create a Working Set with a name that has a client-side template injection payload. Input validation is missing during creation of the working set. For an external attacker, it is very difficult to exploit this, because a few dynamically created parameters such as Jsession-id, a CSRF token, and an Nxsrf token would be needed. The attack can realistically only be performed by an internal user. | ||||
CVE-2023-26059 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
An issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct before 22 SP1037. On the Site Configuration Tool tab, attackers can upload a ZIP file which, when processed, exploits Stored XSS. The upload option of the Site Configuration tool does not validate the file contents. The application is in a demilitarised zone behind a perimeter firewall and without exposure to the internet. The attack can only be performed by an internal user. | ||||
CVE-2023-26058 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
An XXE issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct before 22 FP2211 via an XML document to a Performance Manager page. Input validation and a proper XML parser configuration are missing. For an external attacker, it is very difficult to exploit this, because a few dynamically created parameters such as Jsession-id, a CSRF token, and an Nxsrf token would be needed. The attack can realistically only be performed by an internal user. | ||||
CVE-2023-26057 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
An XXE issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct before 22 FP2211 via an XML document to the Configuration Dashboard page. Input validation and a proper XML parser configuration are missing. For an external attacker, it is very difficult to exploit this, because a few dynamically created parameters such as Jsession-id, a CSRF token, and an Nxsrf token would be needed. The attack can realistically only be performed by an internal user. | ||||
CVE-2022-30280 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
/SecurityManagement/html/createuser.jsf in Nokia NetAct 22 allows CSRF. A remote attacker is able to create users with arbitrary privileges, even administrative privileges. The application (even if it implements a CSRF token for the random GET request) does not ever verify a CSRF token. With a little help of social engineering/phishing (such as sending a link via email or chat), an attacker may trick the users of a web application into executing actions of the attacker's choosing. If the victim is a normal user, a successful CSRF attack can force the user to perform state changing requests like transferring funds, changing their email address, and so forth. If the victim is an administrative account, CSRF can compromise the entire web application. | ||||
CVE-2022-28867 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
An issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct 22 through the Administration of Measurements website section. A malicious user can edit or add the templateName parameter in order to include JavaScript code, which is then stored and executed by a victim's web browser. The most common mechanism for delivering malicious content is to include it as a parameter in a URL that is posted publicly or e-mailed directly to victims. Here, the /aom/html/EditTemplate.jsf and /aom/html/ViewAllTemplatesPage.jsf templateName parameter is used. | ||||
CVE-2022-28865 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
An issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct 22 through the Site Configuration Tool website section. A malicious user can change a filename of an uploaded file to include JavaScript code, which is then stored and executed by a victim's web browser. The most common mechanism for delivering malicious content is to include it as a parameter in a URL that is posted publicly or e-mailed directly to victims. Here, the /netact/sct filename parameter is used. | ||||
CVE-2022-28864 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
An issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct 22 through the Administration of Measurements website section. A malicious user can edit or add the templateName parameter in order to include malicious code, which is then downloaded as a .csv or .xlsx file and executed on a victim machine. Here, the /aom/html/EditTemplate.jsf and /aom/html/ViewAllTemplatesPage.jsf templateName parameter is used. | ||||
CVE-2022-28863 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
An issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct 22. A remote user, authenticated to the website, can visit the Site Configuration Tool section and arbitrarily upload potentially dangerous files without restrictions via the /netact/sct dir parameter in conjunction with the operation=upload value. | ||||
CVE-2021-26597 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
An issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct 18A. A remote user, authenticated to the NOKIA NetAct Web Page, can visit the Site Configuration Tool web site section and arbitrarily upload potentially dangerous files without restrictions via the /netact/sct dir parameter in conjunction with the operation=upload value. | ||||
CVE-2021-26596 | 1 Nokia | 1 Netact | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
An issue was discovered in Nokia NetAct 18A. A malicious user can change a filename of an uploaded file to include JavaScript code, which is then stored and executed by a victim's web browser. The most common mechanism for delivering malicious content is to include it as a parameter in a URL that is posted publicly or e-mailed directly to victims. Here, the /netact/sct filename parameter is used. |
Page 1 of 1.