Filtered by vendor Google
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Android
Subscriptions
Total
9282 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0126 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-24 | 8.8 High |
| In WC-Radio, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48595 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-24 | 8.4 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to achieve code execution due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34694 | 5 Adobe, Apple, Google and 2 more | 7 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager, Iphone Os and 4 more | 2026-06-24 | 4.8 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE versions LTS SP1, 6.5.24.0 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2011-0627 | 7 Adobe, Apple, Google and 4 more | 7 Flash Player, Mac Os X, Android and 4 more | 2026-06-23 | 8.8 High |
| Adobe Flash Player before 10.3.181.14 on Windows, Mac OS X, Linux, and Solaris and before 10.3.185.21 on Android allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption) via crafted Flash content, as possibly exploited in the wild in May 2011 by a Microsoft Office document with an embedded .swf file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28573 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-22 | N/A |
| In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12032 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-06-22 | 3.1 Low |
| Inappropriate implementation in Passwords in Google Chrome on Android prior to 149.0.7827.115 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to bypass site isolation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-30783 | 6 Apple, Google, Linux and 3 more | 7 Iphone Os, Macos, Android and 4 more | 2026-06-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android, WebClient (Client signaling, API sync loop, config management modules) allows Privilege Abuse. This vulnerability is associated with program files src/rendezvous_mediator.Rs, src/hbbs_http/sync.Rs and program routines API sync loop, api-server config handling. This issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30789 | 6 Apple, Google, Linux and 3 more | 7 Iphone Os, Macos, Android and 4 more | 2026-06-22 | 9.8 Critical |
| Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Client login, peer authentication modules) allows Password Brute Forcing. The authentication proof is SHA256(SHA256(password + salt) + challenge), where both the salt and the challenge are generated entirely by the server with no client-side nonce, and the hash uses no slow key-derivation function. A rogue or on-path API/relay server (see CVE-2026-30794 / CVE-2026-30797) can issue a chosen salt and challenge, capture the resulting proof, and recover the password offline. The capture-replay claim (CWE-294) is withdrawn: the challenge is regenerated per connection (challenge = Config::get_auto_password(6)), so a captured proof is not replayable against the legitimate server. The 1.4.7 OTP brute-force limiter and the existing LOGIN_FAILURES counter constrain only ONLINE attempts and do not address offline recovery. This vulnerability is associated with program files src/client.rs and program routines handle_hash(), handle_login_from_ui() (login proof construction). This issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30794 | 6 Apple, Google, Linux and 3 more | 7 Iphone Os, Macos, Android and 4 more | 2026-06-22 | 8.1 High |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30798 | 6 Apple, Google, Linux and 3 more | 7 Iphone Os, Macos, Android and 4 more | 2026-06-22 | 7.5 High |
| Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity, Improper Handling of Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Heartbeat sync loop, strategy processing modules) allows Protocol Manipulation. This vulnerability is associated with program files src/hbbs_http/sync.Rs and program routines stop-service handler in heartbeat loop. This issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30792 | 6 Apple, Google, Linux and 3 more | 7 Iphone Os, Macos, Android and 4 more | 2026-06-22 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android, WebClient (Strategy sync, HTTP API client, config options engine modules) allows Application API Message Manipulation via Man-in-the-Middle. This vulnerability is associated with program files src/hbbs_http/sync.Rs, hbb_common/src/config.Rs and program routines Strategy merge loop in sync.Rs, Config::set_options(). This issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0019 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-19 | 7.8 High |
| In SettingsLib, there is a possible way to disable system components due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0057 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-19 | 3.3 Low |
| In Contacts Provider, there is a possible way to access an incoming call's phone number and associated metadata due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0092 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-19 | N/A |
| In Package Manager, there is a possible device lock controller bypass due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28615 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-19 | N/A |
| In Telecomm, there is a possible way to initiate an unauthorized phone call due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48640 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-19 | 8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible 3rd party passkey entry pairing approval due to a missing permission check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48643 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-19 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations there is a possible provisioning bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0083 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-19 | N/A |
| In Nfc::eventCallback() of Nfc.h, there is a possible use after free due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0071 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-19 | N/A |
| In SettingsLib, there is a possible missing permission check due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48617 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-06-19 | 7.8 High |
| In overrideConfig of CarrierConfigLoader.java, there is a possible way to bypass UID check due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
ReportizFlow