ReportizFlow
Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
8339 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-31294 | 1 Razormist | 1 Online Discussion Forum Site | 2025-04-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue in the save_users() function of Online Discussion Forum Site 1 allows unauthenticated attackers to arbitrarily create or update user accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2021-46027 | 1 Wangl1989 | 1 Mysiteforme | 2025-04-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| mysiteforme, as of 19-12-2022, has a CSRF vulnerability in the background blog management. The attacker constructs a CSRF load. Once the administrator clicks a malicious link, a blog tag will be added | ||||
| CVE-2022-41263 | 1 Sap | 1 Business Objects Business Intelligence Platform | 2025-04-22 | 4.3 Medium |
| Due to a missing authentication check, SAP Business Objects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Intelligence) - versions 420, 430, allows an authenticated non-administrator attacker to modify the data source information for a document that is otherwise restricted. On successful exploitation, the attacker can modify information causing a limited impact on the integrity of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46074 | 1 Helmet Store Showroom Project | 1 Helmet Store Showroom | 2025-04-22 | 8.8 High |
| Helmet Store Showroom 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). An unauthenticated user can add an admin account due to missing CSRF protection. | ||||
| CVE-2022-46062 | 1 Gym Management System Project | 1 Gym Management System | 2025-04-22 | 4.5 Medium |
| Gym Management System v0.0.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2024-42612 | 2 Pigg, Pligg | 2 Cms, Pligg Cms | 2025-04-21 | 8.8 High |
| Pligg CMS v2.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/domain_management.php?whitelist_add | ||||
| CVE-2024-42619 | 2 Kliqqi, Pligg | 2 Kliqqi Cms, Pligg Cms | 2025-04-21 | 8.8 High |
| Pligg CMS v2.0.2 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability via /admin/domain_management.php?id=0&list=whitelist&remove=pligg.com | ||||
| CVE-2025-3284 | 2025-04-21 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The User Registration & Membership – Custom Registration Form, Login Form, and User Profile plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the user_registration_pro_delete_account() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force delete users, including administrators, via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2022-30694 | 1 Siemens | 223 6ag1151-8ab01-7ab0, 6ag1151-8ab01-7ab0 Firmware, 6ag1151-8fb01-2ab0 and 220 more | 2025-04-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| The login endpoint /FormLogin in affected web services does not apply proper origin checking. This could allow authenticated remote attackers to track the activities of other users via a login cross-site request forgery attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15516 | 1 Netapp | 1 Snapcenter Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| NetApp SnapCenter Server versions 1.1 through 2.x are susceptible to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability which could be used to cause an unintended authenticated action in the user interface. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6897 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the wp_ajax_update_plugin function in wp-admin/includes/ajax-actions.php in WordPress before 4.6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of subscribers for /dev/random read operations by leveraging a late call to the check_ajax_referer function, a related issue to CVE-2016-6896. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8624 | 1 Mediawiki | 1 Mediawiki | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12, 1.24.x before 1.24.5, 1.25.x before 1.25.4, and 1.26.x before 1.26.1 does not perform token comparison in constant time before determining if a debugging message should be logged, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8623. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8623 | 1 Mediawiki | 1 Mediawiki | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The User::matchEditToken function in includes/User.php in MediaWiki before 1.23.12 and 1.24.x before 1.24.5 does not perform token comparison in constant time before returning, which allows remote attackers to guess the edit token and bypass CSRF protection via a timing attack, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-8624. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6806 | 1 Apache | 1 Wicket | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Wicket 6.x before 6.25.0, 7.x before 7.5.0, and 8.0.0-M1 provide a CSRF prevention measure that fails to discover some cross origin requests. The mitigation is to not only check the Origin HTTP header, but also take the Referer HTTP header into account when no Origin was provided. Furthermore, not all Wicket server side targets were subjected to the CSRF check. This was also fixed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9033 | 1 Trendmicro | 1 Serverprotect | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to start an update from an arbitrary source via a crafted request to SProtectLinux/scanoption_set.cgi, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7178 | 2 Debian, Deluge-torrent | 2 Debian Linux, Deluge | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| CSRF was discovered in the web UI in Deluge before 1.3.14. The exploitation methodology involves (1) hosting a crafted plugin that executes an arbitrary program from its __init__.py file and (2) causing the victim to download, install, and enable this plugin. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7404 | 1 Dlink | 1 Dir-615 | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| On the D-Link DIR-615 before v20.12PTb04, if a victim logged in to the Router's Web Interface visits a malicious site from another Browser tab, the malicious site then can send requests to the victim's Router without knowing the credentials (CSRF). An attacker can host a page that sends a POST request to Form2File.htm that tries to upload Firmware to victim's Router. This causes the router to reboot/crash resulting in Denial of Service. An attacker may succeed in uploading malicious Firmware. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6634 | 1 Cisco | 5 Ie-1000-4p2s-lm, Ie-1000-4t1t-lm, Ie-1000-6t2t-lm and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Device Manager web interface of Cisco Industrial Ethernet 1000 Series Switches 1.3 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against a user of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protection by the Device Manager web interface. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link or visit an attacker-controlled website. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to submit arbitrary requests to an affected device via the Device Manager web interface and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc88811. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7423 | 1 Microfocus | 2 Enterprise Developer, Enterprise Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) vulnerability in esfadmingui in Micro Focus Enterprise Developer and Enterprise Server 2.3, 2.3 Update 1 before Hotfix 8, and 2.3 Update 2 before Hotfix 9 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to forge requests, if this component is configured. This includes creating new privileged credentials, resulting in privilege elevation (CWE-275). Note esfadmingui is not enabled by default. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7431 | 2 Netiq, Novell | 2 Imanager, Imanager | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Novell iManager 2.7.x before 2.7 SP7 Patch 10 HF1 and NetIQ iManager 3.x before 3.0.3.1 have persistent CSRF in object management. | ||||