Filtered by vendor Ibm
Subscriptions
Total
8267 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2006-1093 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Unspecified vulnerability in IBM WebSphere 5.0.2.10 through 5.0.2.15 and 5.1.1.4 through 5.1.1.9 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unknown attack vectors, which causes JSP source code to be revealed. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2175 | 1 Ibm | 1 Lotus Notes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The web interface for Lotus Notes mail automatically processes HTML in an attachment without prompting the user to save or open it, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct web-based attacks and steal cookies. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2232 | 1 Ibm | 1 Aix | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in invscout in IBM AIX 5.1.0 through 5.3.0 might allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a long command line argument. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2233 | 1 Ibm | 1 Aix | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in multiple "p" commands in IBM AIX 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 might allow local users to execute arbitrary code via long command line arguments to (1) penable or other hard-linked files including (2) pdisable, (3) pstart, (4) phold, (5) pdelay, or (6) pshare. | ||||
| CVE-2005-2234 | 1 Ibm | 1 Aix | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the getlvname command in IBM AIX 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3, might allow local users to execute arbitrary code via long command line arguments. | ||||
| CVE-2005-1872 | 1 Ibm | 1 Websphere Application Server | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the administrative console in IBM WebSphere Application Server 5.x, when the global security option is enabled, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12755 | 1 Ibm | 2 Mq Advanced, Mq Operator | 2026-04-15 | 4 Medium |
| IBM MQ Operator (SC2 v3.2.0–3.8.1, LTS v2.0.0–2.0.29) and IBM‑supplied MQ Advanced container images (across affected SC2, CD, and LTS 9.3.x–9.4.x releases) contain a vulnerability where log messages are not properly neutralized before being written to log files. This flaw could allow an unauthorized user to inject malicious data into MQ log entries, potentially leading to misleading logs, log manipulation, or downstream log‑processing issues. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12985 | 1 Ibm | 1 License Metric Tool | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| IBM Licensing Operator incorrectly assigns privileges to security critical files which could allow a local root escalation inside a container running the IBM Licensing Operator image. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14115 | 1 Ibm | 1 Sterling Connectdirect For Unix Container | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for UNIX Container 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.6 Interim Fix 016, and 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.3 Interim Fix 019 IBM® Sterling Connect:Direct for UNIX contains hard-coded credentials, such as a password or cryptographic key, which it uses for its own inbound authentication, outbound communication to external components, or encryption of internal data. | ||||
| CVE-2024-40685 | 1 Ibm | 1 Operations Analytics - Log Analysis | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Operations Analytics – Log Analysis versions 1.3.5.0 through 1.3.8.3 and IBM SmartCloud Analytics – Log Analysis are vulnerable to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could allow an attacker to trick a trusted user into performing unauthorized actions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39724 | 1 Ibm | 1 Big Sql | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Db2 Big SQL on Cloud Pak for Data versions 7.6 (on CP4D 4.8), 7.7 (on CP4D 5.0), and 7.8 (on CP4D 5.1) do not properly limit the allocation of system resources. An authenticated user with internal knowledge of the environment could exploit this weakness to cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53979 | 1 Ibm | 1 Zhmc | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High |
| ibm.ibm_zhmc is an Ansible collection for the IBM Z HMC. The Ansible collection "ibm.ibm_zhmc" writes password-like properties in clear text into its log file and into the output returned by some of its Ansible module in the following cases: 1. The 'boot_ftp_password' and 'ssc_master_pw' properties are passed as input to the zhmc_partition Ansible module. 2. The 'ssc_master_pw' and 'zaware_master_pw' properties are passed as input to the zhmc_lpar Ansible module. 3. The 'password' property is passed as input to the zhmc_user Ansible module (just in log file, not in module output). 4. The 'bind_password' property is passed as input to the zhmc_ldap_server_definition Ansible module. These properties appear in the module output only when they were specified in the module input and when creating or updating the corresponding resources. They do not appear in the output when retrieving facts for the corresponding resources. These properties appear in the log file only when the "log_file" module input parameter is used. By default, no log file is created. This issue has been fixed in ibm.ibm_zhmc version 1.9.3. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14150 | 1 Ibm | 1 Webmethods Integration On Prem Integration Server | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM webMethods Integration (on prem) - Integration Server 10.15 through IS_10.15_Core_Fix2411.1 to IS_11.1_Core_Fix8 IBM webMethods Integration could disclose sensitive user information in server responses. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13491 | 1 Ibm | 1 App Connect Enterprise Certified Container | 2026-04-15 | 5.1 Medium |
| IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container CD: 11.2.0 through 11.6.0, 12.1.0 through 12.19.0 and 12.0 LTS: 12.0.0 through 12.0.19 could allow an attacker to access sensitive files or modify configurations due to an untrusted search path. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13375 | 1 Ibm | 1 Common Cryptographic Architecture | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Common Cryptographic Architecture (CCA) 7.5.52 and 8.4.82 could allow an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-33135 | 1 Ibm | 2 Financial Transaction Manager For Ach Services And Check Services For Multi-platform, Financial Transaction Manager For Ach Services And Check Services For Multi Platform | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| IBM Financial Transaction Manager for ACH Services and Check Services for Multi-Platform 3.0.0.0 through 3.0.5.4 Interim Fix 027 IBM Financial Transaction Manager for Check Services v3 (Multiplatforms) is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4788 | 1 Ibm | 3 Tivoli Netcool/impact, Tivoli Netcool\/impact, Tivoli Netcool Impact | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| IBM Tivoli Netcool Impact 7.1.0.0 through 7.1.0.37 stores sensitive information in log files that could be read by a local user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3357 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Desktop, Langflow | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow Desktop 1.6.0 through 1.8.2 Langflow could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary code on the system, caused by an insecure default setting which permits the deserialization of untrusted data in the FAISS component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1342 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-04-10 | 8.5 High |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 could allow a locally authenticated user to execute malicious scripts from outside of its control sphere. | ||||
| CVE-2026-1343 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-04-10 | 7.2 High |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 allows an attacker to contact internal authentication endpoints which are protected by the Reverse Proxy. | ||||
ReportizFlow