ReportizFlow
Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
1821 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-3718 | 6 Canonical, Imagemagick, Opensuse and 3 more | 31 Ubuntu Linux, Imagemagick, Leap and 28 more | 2025-10-22 | 5.5 Medium |
| The (1) HTTP and (2) FTP coders in ImageMagick before 6.9.3-10 and 7.x before 7.0.1-1 allow remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted image. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21893 | 1 Ivanti | 3 Connect Secure, Neurons For Zero-trust Access, Policy Secure | 2025-10-22 | 8.2 High |
| A server-side request forgery vulnerability in the SAML component of Ivanti Connect Secure (9.x, 22.x) and Ivanti Policy Secure (9.x, 22.x) and Ivanti Neurons for ZTA allows an attacker to access certain restricted resources without authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62427 | 1 Angular | 1 Angular | 2025-10-21 | N/A |
| The Angular SSR is a server-rise rendering tool for Angular applications. The vulnerability is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) flaw within the URL resolution mechanism of Angular's Server-Side Rendering package (@angular/ssr) before 19.2.18, 20.3.6, and 21.0.0-next.8. The function createRequestUrl uses the native URL constructor. When an incoming request path (e.g., originalUrl or url) begins with a double forward slash (//) or backslash (\\), the URL constructor treats it as a schema-relative URL. This behavior overrides the security-intended base URL (protocol, host, and port) supplied as the second argument, instead resolving the URL against the scheme of the base URL but adopting the attacker-controlled hostname. This allows an attacker to specify an external domain in the URL path, tricking the Angular SSR environment into setting the page's virtual location (accessible via DOCUMENT or PlatformLocation tokens) to this attacker-controlled domain. Any subsequent relative HTTP requests made during the SSR process (e.g., using HttpClient.get('assets/data.json')) will be incorrectly resolved against the attacker's domain, forcing the server to communicate with an arbitrary external endpoint. This vulnerability is fixed in 19.2.18, 20.3.6, and 21.0.0-next.8. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62505 | 1 Lobehub | 1 Lobe Chat | 2025-10-21 | 3 Low |
| LobeChat is an open source chat application platform. The web-crawler package in LobeChat version 1.136.1 allows server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the tools.search.crawlPages tRPC endpoint. A client can supply an arbitrary urls array together with impls containing the value naive. The service passes the user URLs to Crawler.crawl and the naive implementation performs a server-side fetch of each supplied URL without validating or restricting internal network addresses (such as localhost, 127.0.0.1, private IP ranges, or cloud instance metadata endpoints). This allows an attacker with a valid user token (or in development mode using a bypass header) to make the server disclose responses from internal HTTP services, potentially exposing internal API data or cloud metadata credentials. Version 1.136.2 fixes the issue. Update to version 1.136.2. No known workarounds exist. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60279 | 1 Illia Cloud | 1 Illia-builder | 2025-10-21 | 9.6 Critical |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Illia Cloud illia-Builder before v4.8.5 allows authenticated users to send arbitrary requests to internal services via the API. An attacker can leverage this to enumerate open ports based on response discrepancies and interact with internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11864 | 1 Nucleoidai | 1 Nucleoid | 2025-10-21 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11361 | 2 Wordpress, Wpdevteam | 2 Wordpress, Gutenberg Essential Blocks | 2025-10-21 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Gutenberg Essential Blocks – Page Builder for Gutenberg Blocks & Patterns plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.7.1 via the eb_save_ai_generated_image function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Author-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11536 | 3 Bdthemes, Element Pack Elementor Addons Wordpress, Wordpress | 4 Element Pack, Element Pack Elementor Addons, Element Pack Elementor Addons Wordpress and 1 more | 2025-10-21 | 5 Medium |
| The Element Pack Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 8.2.5 via the wp_ajax_import_elementor_template action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12068 | 1 Hliu | 1 Llava | 2025-10-21 | N/A |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was discovered in haotian-liu/llava, affecting version git c121f04. This vulnerability allows an attacker to make the server perform HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs, potentially accessing sensitive data that is only accessible from the server, such as AWS metadata credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10056 | 2 Miunosoft, Wordpress | 2 Task Scheduler, Wordpress | 2025-10-21 | 4.4 Medium |
| The Task Scheduler plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6.3 via the “Check Website” task. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9065 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Thinmanager | 2025-10-20 | 8.8 High |
| A server-side request forgery security issue exists within Rockwell Automation ThinManager® software due to the lack of input sanitization. Authenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability by specifying external SMB paths, exposing the ThinServer® service account NTLM hash. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9975 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-10-20 | 6.8 Medium |
| The WP Scraper plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.8.1 via the wp_scraper_extract_content function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. On Cloud instances, this issue allows for metadata retrieving. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7759 | 1 Jeesite | 1 Jeesite | 2025-10-20 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in thinkgem JeeSite up to 5.12.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file modules/core/src/main/java/com/jeesite/common/ueditor/ActionEnter.java of the component UEditor Image Grabber. Such manipulation of the argument Source leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The name of the patch is 1c5e49b0818037452148e0f8ff69ed04cb8fefdc. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57644 | 1 Accela | 1 Automation Platform | 2025-10-17 | 9.1 Critical |
| Accela Automation Platform 22.2.3.0.230103 contains multiple vulnerabilities in the Test Script feature. An authenticated administrative user can execute arbitrary Java code on the server, resulting in remote code execution. In addition, improper input validation allows for arbitrary file write and server-side request forgery (SSRF), enabling interaction with internal or external systems. Successful exploitation can lead to full server compromise, unauthorized access to sensitive data, and further network exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6242 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ai Inference Server, Enterprise Linux Ai | 2025-10-17 | 7.1 High |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the MediaConnector class within the vLLM project's multimodal feature set. The load_from_url and load_from_url_async methods fetch and process media from user-provided URLs without adequate restrictions on the target hosts. This allows an attacker to coerce the vLLM server into making arbitrary requests to internal network resources. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54087 | 1 Absolute | 1 Secure Access | 2025-10-16 | 2.6 Low |
| CVE-2025-54087 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in Secure Access prior to version 14.10. Attackers with administrative privileges can publish a crafted test HTTP request originating from the Secure Access server. The attack complexity is high, there are no attack requirements, and user interaction is required. There is no direct impact to confidentiality, integrity, or availability. There is a low severity subsequent system impact to integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57305 | 2 Vitara, Vitaracharts | 2 Charts, Vitaracharts | 2025-10-16 | 6.5 Medium |
| VitaraCharts 5.3.5 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in fileLoader.jsp. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55971 | 2 Google, Tcl | 4 Android Tv, 65c655, 65c655 Firmware and 1 more | 2025-10-15 | 4.7 Medium |
| TCL 65C655 Smart TV, running firmware version V8-R75PT01-LF1V269.001116 (Android TV, Kernel 5.4.242+), is vulnerable to a blind, unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability via the UPnP MediaRenderer service (AVTransport:1). The device accepts unauthenticated SetAVTransportURI SOAP requests over TCP/16398 and attempts to retrieve externally referenced URIs, including attacker-controlled payloads. The blind SSRF allows for sending requests on behalf of the TV, which can be leveraged to probe for other internal or external services accessible by the device (e.g., 127.0.0.1:16XXX, LAN services, or internet targets), potentially enabling additional exploit chains. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53760 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Sharepoint Enterprise Server 2016, Sharepoint Server, Sharepoint Server 2019 | 2025-10-15 | 7.1 High |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45195 | 2 Adminer, Adminerevo | 2 Adminer, Adminerevo | 2025-10-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Adminer and AdminerEvo are vulnerable to SSRF via database connection fields. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to enumerate or access systems the attacker would not otherwise have access to. Adminer is no longer supported, but this issue was fixed in AdminerEvo version 4.8.4. | ||||