Filtered by vendor Wolfssl
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Wolfssl
Subscriptions
Total
57 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2016-7440 | 4 Debian, Mariadb, Oracle and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Mariadb, Mysql and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
The C software implementation of AES Encryption and Decryption in wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.9.10 makes it easier for local users to discover AES keys by leveraging cache-bank timing differences. | ||||
CVE-2016-7439 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The C software implementation of RSA in wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.9.10 makes it easier for local users to discover RSA keys by leveraging cache-bank hit differences. | ||||
CVE-2016-7438 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
The C software implementation of ECC in wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.9.10 makes it easier for local users to discover RSA keys by leveraging cache-bank hit differences. | ||||
CVE-2015-7744 | 3 Mariadb, Opensuse, Wolfssl | 4 Mariadb, Leap, Opensuse and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.6.8 does not properly handle faults associated with the Chinese Remainder Theorem (CRT) process when allowing ephemeral key exchange without low memory optimizations on a server, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private RSA keys by capturing TLS handshakes, aka a Lenstra attack. | ||||
CVE-2015-6925 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
wolfSSL (formerly CyaSSL) before 3.6.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption or traffic amplification) via a crafted DTLS cookie in a ClientHello message. | ||||
CVE-2014-2904 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
wolfssl before 3.2.0 has a server certificate that is not properly authorized for server authentication. | ||||
CVE-2014-2903 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
CyaSSL does not check the key usage extension in leaf certificates, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers via a crafted server certificate not authorized for use in an SSL/TLS handshake. | ||||
CVE-2014-2902 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
wolfssl before 3.2.0 does not properly authorize CA certificate for signing other certificates. | ||||
CVE-2014-2901 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
wolfssl before 3.2.0 does not properly issue certificates for a server's hostname. | ||||
CVE-2014-2898 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.9.4 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via multiple calls to the CyaSSL_read function which triggers an out-of-bounds read when an error occurs, related to not checking the return code and MAC verification failure. | ||||
CVE-2014-2897 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
The SSL 3 HMAC functionality in wolfSSL CyaSSL 2.5.0 before 2.9.4 does not check the padding length when verification fails, which allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted HMAC, which triggers an out-of-bounds read. | ||||
CVE-2014-2896 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
The DoAlert function in the (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in wolfSSL CyaSSL before 2.9.4 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact and vectors, which trigger memory corruption or an out-of-bounds read. | ||||
CVE-2024-5991 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-09-07 | 7.5 High |
In function MatchDomainName(), input param str is treated as a NULL terminated string despite being user provided and unchecked. Specifically, the function X509_check_host() takes in a pointer and length to check against, with no requirements that it be NULL terminated. If a caller was attempting to do a name check on a non-NULL terminated buffer, the code would read beyond the bounds of the input array until it found a NULL terminator.This issue affects wolfSSL: through 5.7.0. | ||||
CVE-2024-2881 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Wolfssl | 4 Linux Kernel, Windows, Wolfcrypt and 1 more | 2024-09-04 | 6.7 Medium |
Fault Injection vulnerability in wc_ed25519_sign_msg function in wolfssl/wolfcrypt/src/ed25519.c in WolfSSL wolfssl5.6.6 on Linux/Windows allows remote attacker co-resides in the same system with a victim process to disclose information and escalate privileges via Rowhammer fault injection to the ed25519_key structure. | ||||
CVE-2024-1545 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Wolfssl | 4 Linux Kernel, Windows, Wolfcrypt and 1 more | 2024-09-04 | 5.9 Medium |
Fault Injection vulnerability in RsaPrivateDecryption function in wolfssl/wolfcrypt/src/rsa.c in WolfSSL wolfssl5.6.6 on Linux/Windows allows remote attacker co-resides in the same system with a victim process to disclose information and escalate privileges via Rowhammer fault injection to the RsaKey structure. | ||||
CVE-2024-1543 | 1 Wolfssl | 2 Wolfcrypt, Wolfssl | 2024-09-04 | 4.1 Medium |
The side-channel protected T-Table implementation in wolfSSL up to version 5.6.5 protects against a side-channel attacker with cache-line resolution. In a controlled environment such as Intel SGX, an attacker can gain a per instruction sub-cache-line resolution allowing them to break the cache-line-level protection. For details on the attack refer to: https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500 | ||||
CVE-2024-5814 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2024-08-28 | N/A |
A malicious TLS1.2 server can force a TLS1.3 client with downgrade capability to use a ciphersuite that it did not agree to and achieve a successful connection. This is because, aside from the extensions, the client was skipping fully parsing the server hello. https://doi.org/10.46586/tches.v2024.i1.457-500 |