Filtered by vendor Subscriptions
Total 409500 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2008-7304 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none
CVE-2008-7260 2023-11-07 N/A
This candidate is unused by its CNA.
CVE-2008-7259 2023-11-07 N/A
This candidate is unused by its CNA.
CVE-2008-6800 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate is not a security issue. It was originally created based on one vendor's misinterpretation of an upstream changelog comment that referred to a race condition in the winbind daemon (aka winbindd) in Samba before 3.0.32. The upstream vendor states: "The Samba Team sees no way to exploit this race condition by a user of the system or an external attacker. In order to be able to trigger the race condition a privileged user (root) need to intentionally kill a winbind child process and carefully time the killing to trigger the race condition. Although, if the user is already privileged, it can more easily just kill the parent process directly." CVE concurs with the dispute. Notes: CVE users should not use this identifier
CVE-2008-2728 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2726. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2726. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2726 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
CVE-2008-2727 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2725. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2725. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2725 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
CVE-2008-1879 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none
CVE-2008-1683 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0887. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0887. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0887 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
CVE-2007-6749 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none
CVE-2007-6748 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none
CVE-2007-6747 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none
CVE-2007-6678 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6167. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6167. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6167 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
CVE-2007-6590 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2809. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2809. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2809 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
CVE-2007-6370 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5583. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5583. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5583 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
CVE-2007-6256 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none
CVE-2007-6247 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none
CVE-2007-6070 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1382. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-1382. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1382 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
CVE-2007-6034 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6062. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6062. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6062 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
CVE-2007-5968 2023-11-07 N/A
DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6313. Reason: this candidate's description and references were inconsistent and described unrelated, non-security issues. The original intended issue is covered by CVE-2007-6313. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage
CVE-2007-5908 2023-11-07 N/A
Buffer overflow in the (1) sysfs_show_available_clocksources and (2) sysfs_show_current_clocksources functions in Linux kernel 2.6.23 and earlier might allow local users to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via crafted clock source names. NOTE: follow-on analysis by Linux developers states that "There is no way for unprivileged users (or really even the root user) to add new clocksources.