ReportizFlow
Filtered by vendor
Subscriptions
Total
1053 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-59271 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Azure Cache For Redis, Azure Cache For Redis Enterprise, Azure Managed Redis | 2025-12-11 | 8.7 High |
| Redis Enterprise Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-40830 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinec Security Monitor | 2025-12-11 | 6.7 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEC Security Monitor (All versions < V4.10.0). The affected application does not have proper authorization checks for the file_transfer feature in ssmctl-client command. This could allow an authenticated, lowly privileged local attacker to read or write to any file on server or sensor. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64655 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Dynamics Omnichannel Sdk Storage Containers | 2025-12-10 | 8.8 High |
| Improper authorization in Dynamics OmniChannel SDK Storage Containers allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2024-30061 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Dynamics 365 | 2025-12-10 | 7.3 High |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 (On-Premises) Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-14206 | 2 Senior-walter, Sourcecodester | 2 Online Student Clearance System, Online Student Clearance System | 2025-12-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in SourceCodester Online Student Clearance System 1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /Admin/delete-fee.php of the component Fee Table Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument ID can lead to improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14089 | 1 Himool | 1 Erp | 2025-12-09 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in Himool ERP up to 2.2. Affected by this issue is the function update_account of the file /api/admin/update_account/ of the component AdminActionViewSet. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12720 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| The g-FFL Cockpit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to IP-based authorization that can be spoofed in the handle_enqueue_only() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.1. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary products. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12505 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-12-08 | 5.4 Medium |
| The weDocs plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.14. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action in the create_item_permissions_check function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global plugin settings. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3199 | 1 Pandarobot | 1 Ruoyi Ai | 2025-12-08 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was found in ageerle ruoyi-ai up to 2.0.1 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file ruoyi-modules/ruoyi-system/src/main/java/org/ruoyi/system/controller/system/SysModelController.java of the component API Interface. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 2.0.2 is able to address this issue. The name of the patch is c0daf641fb25b244591b7a6c3affa35c69d321fe. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14016 | 1 Macrozheng | 1 Mall-swarm | 2025-12-08 | 5.4 Medium |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in macrozheng mall-swarm up to 1.0.3. Affected is the function delete of the file /member/readHistory/delete. Such manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14088 | 1 Ketr | 1 Jepaas | 2025-12-08 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was determined in ketr JEPaaS up to 7.2.8. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /je/load. This manipulation of the argument Authorization causes improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63691 | 2 Pig-mesh, Pig4cloud | 2 Pig, Pig | 2025-12-08 | 9.6 Critical |
| In pig-mesh In Pig version 3.8.2 and below, within the Token Management function under the System Management module, the token query interface (/api/admin/sys-token/page) has an improper permission verification issue, which leads to information leakage. This interface can be called by any user who has completed login authentication, and it returns the plaintext authentication Tokens of all users currently logged in to the system. As a result, ordinary users can obtain the administrator's authentication Token through this interface, thereby forging an administrator account, gaining the system's management permissions, and taking over the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65966 | 2 Hackerbay, Oneuptime | 2 Oneuptime, Oneuptime | 2025-12-05 | 8.1 High |
| OneUptime is a solution for monitoring and managing online services. In version 9.0.5598, a low-permission user can create new accounts through a direct API request instead of being restricted to the intended interface. This issue has been patched in version 9.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4519 | 2 Themeatelier, Wordpress | 2 Idonate, Wordpress | 2025-12-05 | 8.8 High |
| The IDonate – Blood Donation, Request And Donor Management System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation due to a missing capability check on the idonate_donor_password() function in versions 2.1.5 to 2.1.9. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to initiate a password reset for any user (including administrators) and elevate their privileges for full site takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13807 | 1 Orionsec | 1 Orion-ops | 2025-12-04 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in orionsec orion-ops up to 5925824997a3109651bbde07460958a7be249ed1. Affected is the function MachineKeyController of the file orion-ops-api/orion-ops-web/src/main/java/cn/orionsec/ops/controller/MachineKeyController.java of the component API. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13808 | 1 Orionsec | 1 Orion-ops | 2025-12-04 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw has been found in orionsec orion-ops up to 5925824997a3109651bbde07460958a7be249ed1. Affected by this vulnerability is the function update of the file orion-ops-api/orion-ops-web/src/main/java/cn/orionsec/ops/controller/UserController.java of the component User Profile Handler. This manipulation of the argument ID causes improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58386 | 1 Terminalfour | 1 Terminalfour | 2025-12-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Terminalfour 8 through 8.4.1.1, the userLevel parameter in the user management function is not subject to proper server-side authorization checks. A Power User can intercept and modify this parameter to assign the Administrator role to other existing lower-privileged accounts, or invite a new lower-privileged account and escalate its privileges. While manipulating this request, the Power User can also change the target account's password, effectively taking full control of it. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29033 | 1 Jupyter | 1 Oauthenticator | 2025-12-03 | 7.5 High |
| OAuthenticator provides plugins for JupyterHub to use common OAuth providers, as well as base classes for writing one's own Authenticators with any OAuth 2.0 provider. `GoogleOAuthenticator.hosted_domain` is used to restrict what Google accounts can be authorized access to a JupyterHub. The restriction is intented to be to Google accounts part of one or more Google organization verified to control specified domain(s). Prior to version 16.3.0, the actual restriction has been to Google accounts with emails ending with the domain. Such accounts could have been created by anyone which at one time was able to read an email associated with the domain. This was described by Dylan Ayrey (@dxa4481) in this [blog post] from 15th December 2023). OAuthenticator 16.3.0 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, restrict who can login another way, such as `allowed_users` or `allowed_google_groups`. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66290 | 1 Orangehrm | 1 Orangehrm | 2025-12-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66291 | 1 Orangehrm | 1 Orangehrm | 2025-12-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8. | ||||