Filtered by vendor Octopus
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Octopus Deploy
Subscriptions
Total
31 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2023-2247 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-12-03 | 5.3 Medium |
In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to unmask variable secrets using the variable preview function | ||||
CVE-2022-2013 | 3 Linux, Microsoft, Octopus | 3 Linux Kernel, Windows, Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
In Octopus Server after version 2022.1.1495 and before 2022.1.2647 if private spaces were enabled via the experimental feature flag all new users would have access to the Script Console within their private space. | ||||
CVE-2022-23184 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
In affected Octopus Server versions when the server HTTP and HTTPS bindings are configured to localhost, Octopus Server will allow open redirects. | ||||
CVE-2021-26556 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
When Octopus Server is installed using a custom folder location, folder ACLs are not set correctly and could lead to an unprivileged user using DLL side-loading to gain privileged access. | ||||
CVE-2020-27155 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy through 2020.4.4. If enabled, the websocket endpoint may allow an untrusted tentacle host to present itself as a trusted one. | ||||
CVE-2020-26161 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
In Octopus Deploy through 2020.4.2, an attacker could redirect users to an external site via a modified HTTP Host header. | ||||
CVE-2020-25825 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
In Octopus Deploy 3.1.0 to 2020.4.0, certain scripts can reveal sensitive information to the user in the task logs. | ||||
CVE-2020-24566 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
In Octopus Deploy 2020.3.x before 2020.3.4 and 2020.4.x before 2020.4.1, if an authenticated user creates a deployment or runbook process using Azure steps and sets the step's execution location to run on the server/worker, then (under certain circumstances) the account password is exposed in cleartext in the verbose task logs output. | ||||
CVE-2020-14470 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
In Octopus Deploy 2018.8.0 through 2019.x before 2019.12.2, an authenticated user with could trigger a deployment that leaks the Helm Chart repository password. | ||||
CVE-2020-12286 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
In Octopus Deploy before 2019.12.9 and 2020 before 2020.1.12, the TaskView permission is not scoped to any dimension. For example, a scoped user who is scoped to only one tenant can view server tasks scoped to any other tenant. | ||||
CVE-2020-10678 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
In Octopus Deploy before 2020.1.5, for customers running on-premises Active Directory linked to their Octopus server, an authenticated user can leverage a bug to escalate privileges. | ||||
CVE-2019-8944 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
An Information Exposure issue in the Terraform deployment step in Octopus Deploy before 2019.1.8 (and before 2018.10.4 LTS) allows remote authenticated users to view sensitive Terraform output variables via log files. | ||||
CVE-2019-19376 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
In Octopus Deploy before 2019.10.6, an authenticated user with TeamEdit permission could send a malformed Team API request that bypasses input validation and causes an application level denial of service condition. (The fix for this was also backported to LTS 2019.9.8 and LTS 2019.6.14.) | ||||
CVE-2019-19375 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
In Octopus Deploy before 2019.10.7, in a configuration where SSL offloading is enabled, the CSRF cookie was sometimes sent without the secure attribute. (The fix for this was backported to LTS versions 2019.6.14 and 2019.9.8.) | ||||
CVE-2019-19084 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
In Octopus Deploy 3.3.0 through 2019.10.4, an authenticated user with PackagePush permission to upload packages could upload a maliciously crafted package, triggering an exception that exposes underlying operating system details. | ||||
CVE-2019-14525 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
In Octopus Deploy 2019.4.0 through 2019.6.x before 2019.6.6, and 2019.7.x before 2019.7.6, an authenticated system administrator is able to view sensitive values by visiting a server configuration page or making an API call. | ||||
CVE-2019-14268 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
In Octopus Deploy versions 3.0.19 to 2019.7.2, when a web request proxy is configured, an authenticated user (in certain limited circumstances) could trigger a deployment that writes the web request proxy password to the deployment log in cleartext. This is fixed in 2019.7.3. The fix was back-ported to LTS 2019.6.5 as well as LTS 2019.3.7. | ||||
CVE-2019-11632 | 1 Octopus | 2 Octopus Deploy, Octopus Server | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
In Octopus Deploy 2019.1.0 through 2019.3.1 and 2019.4.0 through 2019.4.5, an authenticated user with the VariableViewUnscoped or VariableEditUnscoped permission scoped to a specific project could view or edit unscoped variables from a different project. (These permissions are only used in custom User Roles and do not affect built in User Roles.) | ||||
CVE-2018-9039 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
In Octopus Deploy 2.0 and later before 2018.3.7, an authenticated user, with variable edit permissions, can scope some variables to targets greater than their permissions should allow. In other words, they can see machines beyond their team's scoped environments. | ||||
CVE-2018-5706 | 1 Octopus | 1 Octopus Deploy | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
An issue was discovered in Octopus Deploy before 4.1.9. Any user with user editing permissions can modify teams to give themselves Administer System permissions even if they didn't have them, as demonstrated by use of the RoleEdit or TeamEdit permission. |